Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 341 Download : 288

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

In this study, the elasticity of production costs to broiler business income with the partnership pattern in Banyumas regency and production costs and broiler business income with open and closed house systems were examined. The survey approach was used to conduct the research. As the research site, Banyumas regency, one of the hubs for broiler farming in Central Java, was deliberately chosen. Commercial broiler farmers were categorized according to their housing system when choosing the respondents, and 31 farmers used the open housing system, whereas 30 farmers used the closed housing system. The elasticity of production costs to revenue was examined using multiple linear regression while production costs and profits were assessed financially. According to the findings, commercial broiler farmers made an average of IDR 3,626,578 and IDR 4,896,844 each month for 1000 birds in open and closed houses, respectively. The price of DOC, the depreciation of housing, and the depreciation of the farmers' equipment all have a big impact on their revenue. This study's conclusion is that by lowering broiler mortality and making the best use of housing and equipment, farmers may increase their profitability.

Keywords

Broiler chicken income break even point open-house system closed-house system

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before or is under consideration for publication elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract). When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.

How to Cite
Mastuti, S., Hidayat, N. N., Widiyanti, R., Yuwono, E., Cahyo, D. N., Muatip, K., Setianto, N. A., Sugiarto, M., Safitri, L., Einstein, A., Djatmiko, O. E., & Febrianto, B. S. (2023). Elasticity Analysis of Production Cost Against Income of Broiler Business with Open-House and Closed-House System in Banyumas Regency . ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 25(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2023.25.1.200
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ajijia, SR, DW Sari, and MR Primanti. 2011. Cara cerdas menguasai Eviews. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  2. Alfa, HF, T Ekowati, and M Handayani. 2016. Analisis pendapatan usaha ayam broiler di kecamatan jalaksana kabupaten Kuningan Jawa Barat. Mediagro. 12(2).
  3. Ananta, A, H Hafid, and LOA Sani. 2015. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi produktivitas usaha ternak sapi bali pada peternak transmigran dan non transmigran di Pulau Kabaena Kabupaten Bombana. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis. 2(3):52–67.
  4. Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (VI). Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
  5. Ayu, K, A Setiadi, and T Ekowati. 2020. Analisis Preferensi Konsumen Dalam Membeli Daging Ayam Broiler Di Pasar Tradisional Kota Semarang, Jawa Tengah. AGROMEDIA: Berkala Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian. 38(2):76–89.
  6. Azizah, N, HD Utami, and BA Nugroho. 2013. Analisis pola kemitraan usaha peternakan ayam pedaging sistem closed house di Plandaan Kabupaten Jombang. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan (Indonesian Journal of Animal Science). 23(2):1–5.
  7. Cahyo, DN, and H Purwaningsih. 2022. Analisis Forecasting Dan Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Impor Daging Sapi Indonesia. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Agribisnis Peternakan (STAP) (Vol. 9, pp. 457–464).
  8. Carvalho, RH, AL Soares, M Grespan, RS Spurio, FAG Coró, A Oba, and M Shimokomaki. 2015. The effects of the dark house system on growth, performance and meat quality of broiler chicken. Animal Science Journal. 86(2):189–193.
  9. Evadewi, FD, and T Sukmaningsih. 2021. Evaluasi Pendapatan Peternak Ayam Broiler Pada Sistem Perkandangan Closed House Dan Tradisional. Media Peternakan. 23(2).
  10. Fauzan, M. 2016. Pendapatan, risiko, dan efisiensi ekonomi usahatani bawang merah di Kabupaten Bantul. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research. 2(2):107–117.
  11. Ghozali, I. 2016. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS 23 (8th ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  12. Hafizah, D, DB Hakim, H Harianto, and R Nurmalina. 2021. Analisis Elastisitas Pendapatan Rumah Tangga di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia. 26(3):428–435.
  13. Hairani, RI, JMM Aji, and J Januar. 2014. Analisis Trend Produksi dan Impor Gula serta Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi impor gula Indonesia. Berkala Ilmiah Pertanian. 1(4):77–85.
  14. Istikomah, I, I Suhadi, and M Marhani. 2018. Analisis Pendapatan dan Elastisitas Produksi Usaha Ternak Ayam Kampung Pedaging Intensif di Kecamatan Sangatta Utara dan Bengalon, Kabupaten Kutai Timur. Jurnal Pertanian Terpadu. 6(1):98–109.
  15. Laili, AR, R Damayanti, B Setiawan, and S Hidanah. 2022. Comparison of Broiler Performance in Closed House and Open House Systems in Trenggalek. Journal of Applied Veterinary Science and Technology. 3(1):6–11.
  16. Lestari, RI, K Budiharjo, and M Handayani. 2019. Analisis profitabilitas usaha peternakan pola kemitraan ayam pedaging di Kecamatan Ungaran Timur Kabupaten Semarang. Jurnal Pengembangan Penyuluhan Pertanian. 13(24):47–55.
  17. Mardiatmoko, G. 2020. Pentingnya uji asumsi klasik pada analisis regresi linier berganda (studi kasus penyusunan persamaan allometrik kenari muda [canarium indicum l.]). BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika Dan Terapan. 14(3):333–342.
  18. Muharlien, M, E Sudjarwo, DL Yulianti, AA Hamiyanti, and HS Prayogi. 2020. Comparative production performance of broiler under open house and closed house system. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan (Indonesian Journal of Animal Science). 30(1):86–91.
  19. Mukminah, N. 2020. Profitabilitas usaha peternakan ayam broiler dengan tipe kandang yang berbeda. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Dan Teknologi Rekayasa. 2(1).
  20. Nurihayanti, O. 2022. Pola Kemitraan Ayam Ras Pedaging Pola Kemitraan Ayam Ras Pedaging dan Pengaruh Karakteristik Peternak, Pendapatan serta Pelayanan Perusahaan terhadap Loyalitas Kerjasama (Studi di PT. Semesta Mitra Sejahtera, Kabupaten Tulungagung). Manajemen Agribisnis: Jurnal Agribisnis. 22(2):176–186.
  21. Pakage, S, B Hartono, Z Fanani, BA Nugroho, DA Iyai, JA Palulungan, AR Ollong, and D Nurhayati. 2020. Pengukuran Performa Produksi Ayam Pedaging pada Closed House System dan Open House System di Kabupaten Malang Jawa Timur Indonesia. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia. 15(4):383–389.
  22. Pakage, S, B Hartono, BA Nugroho, and DA Iyai. 2018. Analisis struktur biaya dan pendapatan usaha peternakan ayam pedaging dengan menggunakan closed house system dan open house system. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Animal Science). 20(3):193–200.
  23. Setianto, NA, I Ismoyowati, H Aunurrohman, and V Armelia. 2021. Produktivitas Usaha Peternakan Ayam Broiler Menggunakan Tipe Kandang Semi Closed House Pola Kemitraan Perusahaan Di Kabupaten Kebumen. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Agribisnis Peternakan (STAP) (Vol. 8, pp. 722–728).
  24. Supartama, IM, M Antara, and R Abd Rauf. 2013. Analisis Pendapatan dan Kelayakan Usahatani Padi Sawah di Subak Baturiti Desa Balinggi Kecamatan Balinggi Kabupaten Parigi Moutong (Doctoral Thesis). Universitas Tadulako, Palu.
  25. Susanti, ED, M Dahlan, and D Wahyuning. 2016. Perbandingan produktivitas ayam broiler terhadap sistem kandang terbuka (open house) dan kandang tertutup (closed house) di UD Sumber Makmur Kecamatan Sumberrejo Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Ternak. 7(1).
  26. Sutawi, S. 2013. Profitabilitas Dan Rentabilitas Kemitraan Ayam Pedaging Kandang Terbuka Dan Tertutup. Jurnal Gamma. 8(2):108–116.
  27. Widjayanti, FN, and M Rizal. 2016. Sistem kemitraan dalam usahatani peternakan ayam broiler di Kabupaten Jember. Surya Agritama: Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Dan Peternakan. 5(1).

Most read articles by the same author(s)