Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 150 Download : 100

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the increase in production capacity through genetic quality improvement using selection techniques with the production capability test method in Tegal ducks. The research was conducted using an experimental method, using a nested pattern experimental design, male as treatment, female as sub-treatment, offspring as replicates, and production characteristics as observations. The selection population of Tegal ducks consisted of 10 males, 50 females, and their offspring. Production characteristics recorded included egg weight, hatching weight, and egg production. Egg production measured was Hen Day Production (HDP) at the initial laying period for 90 days. Assessment of genetic quality using individual breeding values (BV). Each individual's breeding value is calculated, and then the estimated breeding value (EBV) results are arranged based on their rank. Selection of parent candidates is done by maintaining 25, 50, and 75% of the total population. Selection results are obtained by estimating the selection response using different selection intensities. The results showed that the average and standard deviation of the characteristics of egg weight, hatching weight, and percentage of egg production in Tegal ducks were 67.76 ± 4.57 g, 40.40 ± 2.16 g, and 63.33 ± 10.89 %, respectively. Heritability values (h2) and standard error of egg weight characteristics, hatching weight, and percentage of egg production in Tegal ducks were 0.47 ± 0.032, 0.39 ± 0.0589, and 0.512 ± 0.071, respectively. The assessment for selection response was conducted based on three factors - egg weight, hatching weight, and percentage of egg production each week. The proportions were maintained at 25%, 50%, and 75%, respectively. The egg weight proportions were 0.46, 0.29, and 0.15, while the hatching weight proportions were 0.71, 0.45, and 0.23, respectively. The percentage of egg production each week was 47.92%, 30.18%, and 15.85%, respectively. The study’s results revealed that the intensity of selection and selection response of the Tegal duck were higher when smaller proportions were used in the selection process. It should be noted that the production characteristics used in the selection process were different, which resulted in varying heritability values and selection responses. Overall, these findings suggest that careful consideration of the selection factors is necessary to achieve optimal results in the selection process of the Tegal duck

Keywords

Production ability test Selection Production characteristics Tegal duck

Article Details

Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before or is under consideration for publication elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract). When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.

How to Cite
Purwantini, D., Sugeng Santosa, R. S., Agus Santosa, S., Susanto, A., & Puspita Candrasari , D. (2024). Performance Test to Select Female Tegal Ducks Based On Production Characteristics. ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 26(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2024.26.1.192-1
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Becker, W.A., 1992. Manual Quantitative Genetics. Eightth Edition. Student Book Corporation. Washington.
  2. Datuin, J. R.M. and V. A. Magpantay. 2013. Hen-day egg production and egg qualities of philippine mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus L.) with varying plumage colors. Philipp J Vet Anim Sci. 39 (2): 211-218
  3. Dewanti, R. Yuhan dan Sudiyono. 2014. Pengaruh Bobot dan Frekuensi Pemutaran Telur terhadap Fertilitas, Daya Tetas dan Bobot Tetas Itik Lokal. Buletin Peternakan. 38 (1): 16-20
  4. Falconer, D. S. 1993. Introduction to quantitative genetics. John Wiley and Son, Inc., New York.
  5. Hardjosubroto, W, 1999. Animal Genetics. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta
  6. Hardjosworo, P.S., D. Sugandi dan D.J. Samosir, 1989. Pengaruh perbedaan kadar protein dalam ransum terhadap pertumbuhan dan kemampuan produksi itik yang dipelihara secara terkurung. Laporan Penelitian Fakultas Peternakan Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. 150.
  7. Ketaren, P.P. and L.H. Prasetyo. 2000. Produktivitas itik silang MA di Ciawi dan Cirebon. Pros. Seminar Nasional Peternakan dan Veteriner. Cisarua – Bogor, 18 – 19 September 2000. Puslit Peternakan, Bogor. p 198 – 205.
  8. Lestari, E. Ismoyowati and Sukardi. 2013. Korelasi antara Bobot Telur dengan Bobot Tetas dan Perbedaan Susut Bobot pada Telur Entok (Cairrina moschata) dan Itik (Anas plathyrhinchos). Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan. 1 (1): 163-169
  9. Meliyati, N., K. Nova dan D. Septinova. 2012. Pengaruh Umur Telur Tetas Itik Mojosari dengan Penetasan Kombinasi Terhadap Fertilitas dan Daya tetas. Jurnal Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Lampung.
  10. North, M. O. dan D. D. Bell. 1990. Commercial Chicken Production Manual. 4th Ed. Avi Book Published by van nostrand reinhold, New York
  11. Onbasilar, E.E., E. Erdem, O. Poynaz and S. Yalcin, 2011. Effects of hen production cycle and egg weight on egg quality and composition, hatchability, duckling quality and first-week body weight in Pekin ducks. Poult. Sci. 90: 2642 - 2647
  12. Prasetyo, L.H. dan T. Susanti. 2007. Pendugaan Parameter Genetik Bobot Hidup Itik Alabio dan Mojosari pada Periode Starter. JITV Vol. 12 (3): 212-217.
  13. Purwantini, D., Ismoyowati and S.A. Santosa. 2015. Pendugaan Nilai Heritabilitas Karakteristik Bobot dan Produksi Telur Itik Tegal. Prosiding Teknologi dan Agribisnis Peternakan untuk Akselerasi Pemenuhan Pangan Hewani (Seri III). ISBN 978-602-1004-09-8/2015/ 635-639.
  14. Putra, W. P. B., Sumadil, T. Hartaik dan H. Saumar. 2015. Seleksi pada Sapi Aceh Berdasarkan Metode Indeks Seleksi (IS) dan Nilai Pemuliaan (NP). Jurnal Peternakan Sriwijaya Vol. 4 (1).
  15. Resi, K., 2009. "Pengaruh Sistem Pemberian pakan yang menganduang Duckweed terhadap produksi telur itik lokal". Skripsi. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Mataram.
  16. Sari, M. L. Ronny, R. N. Peni, S. H and Chairun, N. 2012. Keragaan Telur Tetas Itik Pegagan (Hatching egg performans of Pegagan duck. JSPI 6 (2): 97 - 102
  17. Suhada, H., Sumadi dan N. Ngadiyono. 2009. Estimasi Parameter Genetik Sifat Produksi Sapi Simmental Di Balai Pembibitan Ternak Unggul Sapi Potong Padang Mengatas, Sumatera Barat. Buletin Peternakan Vol. 33 (1): 1-7.
  18. Susanti, T., R.R. Noor, P.S. Hardjosworo dan L.H. Prasetyo. 2012. Relationship of molting trait and egg production on crossbred Peking and Alabio ducks. JITV. 17(2): 112-119
  19. Wardono, H. P., C. Sugihono, H. Kusnadi dan Suprijono. 2014. Korelasi Antara Beberapa Kriteria Peubah Produksi pada Ayam Buras. Prosiding Seminar Nasional “Inovasi Teknologi Pertanian Spesifik Lokasi”.
  20. Warwick, E.J., M. Astuti dan W. Hardjosubroto. 1995. Pemuliaan Ternak. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta
  21. Xue, D.B., S.J. Zhou, Z.J.Bing, G.W. Li, W. Yun and C.X. Ying. 2013. Principal component analysis on egg quality characteristics of native duck breeds in China J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 12 (15): 1286-1288
  22. Yulianti, D. L, P. Trisunuwati, O. Sjofjan and E. Widodo. 2015. Effect of andrographis paniculata a phytobiotic on consumption, feed conversion and Mojosari duck egg production. I.J of Poult. Sci. 14 (9): 529-532