Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 191 Download : 106

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Market organic waste (LOP) is organic residue or residue generated from market trading activities such as residual vegetables, fruits, and other organic foodstuffs. This waste can be a source of environmental problems if not managed properly because it can rot and cause unpleasant odors. Still, if managed properly, it can be used as an alternative feed for livestock. This study aims to evaluate the quality of LOP silage using rejected commercial syrup as silage additives. The manufacture, harvesting, drying, and siege of silage are conducted at the Laboratory of Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University, Riau. The experimental method with a Complete Randomized Design consisting of 5 treatments and five repeats was used in this study. The treatment in question was P1: spinach 33.3% + cabbage 33.3% + kale 33.3% as control, for P2, P3, P4, and P5 plus SKA of 1%, 2, 3, and 4%, respectively, based on dry matter, then enzymatic for 30 days at room temperature. The parameters measured are temperature, humidity, mold growth, and silage pH. The data obtained were analyzed based on variety analysis, and the difference in parameter values between treatments was further tested with a DMRT level of 5%. The results of the variety analysis showed that the use of SKA had a significant effect (P<0.05) on temperature, humidity, fungal growth, and silage pH. The silage temperature at the time of harvesting averages 30±0.39°C; the average humidity is 77±0.25%; mushroom growth averaged 2.87±0.39%; and an average silage pH of 3.67±0.45. The conclusion is that SKA can improve the quality of market organic waste silage by optimizing temperature and humidity during ensilage to minimize pH and mold growth.

Keywords

Silage quality Market organic waste Mold growth pH rejected commercial syrup Silage

Article Details

Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before or is under consideration for publication elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract). When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.

How to Cite
Sadarman, S., Febrina, D., Trisna Rinaldi, S., Hendri, H., Ichwan Ilyazar, M., Weno, W., Alfian, A., Amalia Nurfitriani, R., Qomariyah, N., Sukmara, A., Koswara, E., Rachmanto Prihambodo, T., Gholib, G., & Faiz Mohd Azmi, A. (2023). The Quality of Organic Waste Market Ensiled Using Rejected Commercial Syrup as An Alternative Ruminant Livestock Feed. ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 25(3), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2023.25.3.257
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Baruna, K., J.J. Putra, dan R.O. Kusuma. 2021. Penerapan silase limbah sayur pasar sebagai pakan alternatif udang hias (Neocaridina sp.) di Kelompok Pembudidaya Ikan “Mina Ikari” Desa Mrebet Kabupaten Purbalingga. Prosiding Seminar Nasional dan Call for Papers. Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman. Purwokerto.
  2. Bernardes, T.F., J.R.S. Gervásio., G. De Morais, and D.R. Casagrande. 2019. Technical note: A comparison of methods to determine pH in silages. Journal Dairy Science, 102: 9039–9042.
  3. Borreani, G., E. Tabacco., R.J. Schmidt., R.J. Holmes, and R.E. Muck. 2017. Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. J. Dairy Sci, 101: 3952-3979.
  4. Collins, M and K.J. Moore. 2018. Chapter 17: Preservation of Forage as Hay and Silage. In: Forages, Vol. I: An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture, 7th Edition. Edited by Collins, M., C.J. Nelson., K.J. Moore, and R.F Barnes. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
  5. Dariati, T., K. Mustari., R. Padjung, dan N. Widiayani. 2017. Pengelolaan limbah sayuran pasar menuju pasar swakelola sampah di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Dinamika Pengabdian (JDP), 2(2): 143-152.
  6. Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kebersihan. 2021. Timbulan Sampah Kota. Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kebersihan Kota Pekanbaru. Diakses 8 Mei 2023.
  7. Dryden, G.M. 2021. Fundamentals of Applied Animal Nutrition. CABI Press. England.
  8. Falahudin, A dan O. Imanudin. 2018. Kualitas Daging Domba yang Diberi Pakan Silase Limbah Sayuran. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu, 6(3): 140-146
  9. Irawan, A., A. Sofyan., R. Ridwan., H.A. Hassim., A.N. Respati., W.W. Wardani., Sadarman., W.D. Astuti, and A. Jayanegara. 2021. Effects of different lactic acid bacteria groups and fibrolytic enzymes as additives on silage quality: A meta-analysis. Bioresource Technology Reports. 14, June 2021, 100654.
  10. Kilic, A. C. (1984). Silo Yemi. Bilgeham. Basimevi, Izmir. Cited by Denek, N. and A. Can (2007). Effect of wheat straw and different additives on silage quality and in vitro dry matter digestibility of wet orange pulp. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 6:217.
  11. Kondo, M., K Shimizu., A. Jayanegara., T. Mishima., H. Matsui., S. Karita., M. Goto and T. Fujihara. 2016. Changes in nutrient composition and in vitro ruminal fermentation of total mixed ration silage stored at different temperatures and periods. Journal of Science Food and Agriculture. 96(4): 1175-1180. doi:10.1002/jsfa.7200.
  12. Lima R, Lourenco M, Díaz R F, Castro A and Fievez V 2010 Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 155:122–131
  13. McDonald, P., R.A. Edwards., J.F.D. Greenhalgh., C.A. Morgan., L.A. Sinclair, and R.G. Wilkinson. 2022. Animal Nutrition 8th Edn. Pearson. Singapore.
  14. McDonald, P. 1991. The Biochemestry of Silage. John Wiley and Sons. New York. p 340.
  15. Moore, R. 2018. Principles of Animal Nutrition. Scientific e-Resources Publisher. New York
  16. Muktiani, A., J. Achmadi., B.I.M. Tampoebolon, dan R. Setyorini. 2013. Pemberian silase limbah sayuran yang di supllementasi dengan mineral dan alginat sebagai pakan domba. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan, 2(3): 144-150.
  17. Ojeda B, Carcamo J M, Pedraza A and Golde D W 2002 Biochemistry 41 12995–3002
  18. Okine, A., M. Hanada., Y. Aibibula, and M. Okamoto. 2005. Ensiling of potato pulp with or without bacterial inoculants and its effect on fermentation quality, nutrient composition, and nutritive value. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 121: 329–343
  19. Petrie, A and P. Watson. 2013. Statistics for Veterinary and Animal Science. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. London.
  20. Sadarman., M. Ridla., Nahrowi., R. Ridwan, and A. Jayanegara. 2020. Evaluation of ensiled soy sauce by-product combined with several additives as an animal feed. Veterinary World, 13(5): 940-946.
  21. Sadarman., D. Febrina., T. Wahyono., R. Mulianda., N. Qomariyah., R.A. Nurfitriani., F. Khairi., S. Desraini., Zulkarnain., A.B. Prastyo, dan D.N, Adli. 2022. Kualitas fisik silase rumput gajah dan ampas tahu segar dengan penambahan sirup komersial afkir. Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan. 20(2): 73-77.
  22. Sadarman., J. Handoko., D. Febrina., R. Febriyanti., R.A. Purba., E.S. Ramadhan., N. Qomariah., Gholib., R.A. Nurfitriani., D.N. Adli, dan F. Khairi. 2023a. Evaluasi Penggunaan Kombinasi Aditif Berbasis Molases dan Sirup Komersial Afkir yang dapat Menstimulasi Pertumbuhan Mikroba Baik terhadap Profil Fermentasi Silase Tebon Jagung. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis, 6(1): 57-68.
  23. Sadarman, D. Febrina., N. Qomariyah., F.F. Mulia., S. Ramayanti., S.T. Rinaldi., T.R. Putri., D.N. Adli., R.A. Nurfitriani., M.S. Haq., J. Handoko, dan A.K.S. Putera. 2023b. Pengaruh Penambahan Molases sebagai Sumber Glukosa terhadap Karakteristik Fisiko-Kimia Silase Rumput Gajah. Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan, 21(1): 1-7.
  24. Sariçiçek, B. Z., Yildirim, B., Kocabaş, Z., Demir, E.O. 2016. The Effects of Storage Time on Nutrient Composition and Silage Quality Parameters of Corn Silage Made in Plastic Mini Silo in Laboratory Conditions. J. Inst. Sci. & Tech. 6(3): 177-183.
  25. Siregar, S. 1996. Pengawetan Pakan Ternak. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya
  26. Superianto, S., A.E. Harahap., A. Ali. 2018. Nilai nutrisi silase limbah sayur kol dengan penambahan dedak padi dan lama fermentasi yang berbeda. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 13(2): 172-181.
  27. Sutrisno, K., M. Purba., D. Sulistyorini., A.N. Aini., Y.K. Latifa., E.N.A. Yunita., R. Wulandari., D. Riani., C. Lustriane., S. Aminah., N. Lastri, dan P. Lestari. 2017. Produksi Pangan untuk Industri Rumah Tangga: Sirup Gula. Direktorat Surveilan dan Penyuluhan Keamanan Pangan, Deputi III, Badan POM RI. Jakarta.
  28. Utomo, R., S.P.S. Budhi dan I.F. Astuti. 2013. Pengaruh Level Onggok Sebagai Aditif terhadap Kualitas Silase Isi Rumen Sapi. Buletin Peternakan. 37 (3): 173-180.
  29. Yitbarek, M. and Tamir, B. 2014. Silage Additives: Review. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 4: 258-274. doi: 10.4236/ojapps.2014.45026
  30. Wati WS, Mashudi, Irsyammawati A. 2018. Kualitas silase rumput odot (Pennisetum purpureum cv.Mott) dengan penambahan Lactobacillus plantarum dan molasses pada waktu inkubasi yang berbeda. Jurnal Nutrisi Ternak Tropis 1 (1): 45-53.
  31. Wu, G. 2017. Principles of Animal Nutrition. Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. New York.