Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 637 Download : 568

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Duck is one of the commodities that contribute to the national livestock production and Central Java is home to the fourth biggest duck population after West Java, South Sulawesi and East Java. The 2019 egg production in Central Java was 36.174 tons or 11.3% of the total egg production nationwide. Accordingly, it is important to investigate the effect of environmental factor, total number and age of ducks on egg production in Central Java. Specifically, this study aimed to observe the effect of region on egg production and feed conversion ratio (FCR) and the total livestock (chicken), age (month), stocking density (ducks/m2), internal housing temperature (oC), and humidity (%) on Hen day production/HDP. A survey engaging purposive random sampling was conducted on the population of duck farming in Central Java especially Tegal, Pemalang and Brebes districts. The data were subjected to General Linear Model (GLM) and a regression-correlation analysis using an SPSS program. The result showed that region significantly  affected hen day production (HDP) but did not affect FCR. Housing temperature affected HDP by 14.9% and the higher the temperature, the lower the HDP. Duck age affected HDP by 11.7%, and the older the ducks the lower the egg production. Duck population, stocking density and humidity did not significantly affect egg production. Conclusively, duck egg production (HDP) is significantly affected by temperature inside the housing and the duck age.

Keywords

duck farming hen day production FCR environment factor

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before or is under consideration for publication elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract). When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.

How to Cite
Ismoyowati, I., Suswoyo, I., Rosidi, R., Mugiyono, S., & Hidayat, N. (2020). The Effect of Environmental Factor, Population and Age of Duck on Egg Production . ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 22(2), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2020.22.2.51
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Ariviani, S., G. Fauza and D. Ishartani. 2019. Peningkatan Kualitas and Umur Simpan Telur Asin di Industri Rumah Tangga Telur Asin Melalui Inovasi Proses Produksi. Prosiding PKM-CSR. 2(1): 355-360.
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2019. Central Java Dalam Angka 2019. Central Java.
  3. Bai H., Q. Bao, Y. Zhang, Q. Song, B. Lin, L. Zhang, Z. Wang, Y. Jiang, Q. Xu, G. Chang and G. Chen. 2020. Effects of the Rearing Method and Stocking Density on Carcass Traits and Proximate Composition of Meat in Small-Sized Meat Ducks. Poultry Science. 99(4): 2011–2016.
  4. Baruwa, O.I., A.A. Tijani and T. Alimi. 2018. Determinants of Technical Efficiency in Duck Production in Southwest Nigeria. Agricultura Topica Et Subtropica. 51(3): 113-120.
  5. Basso, B., A. Bordas, F. Dubos, P. Morganx and C. Marie-Etancelin. 2012. Feed Eficiency in the Laying Duck: Appropriate Measurements and Genetic Parameters. Poultry Science. 91: 1065-1073.
  6. Daghir, N.J. 2009. Nutritional Strategies to Reduce Heat Stress in Broilers and Broiler Breeders. Lohmann Information. 44: 6-15.
  7. Dahiya, R., R.S. Berwal, S. Sihag, C.S. Patil and Lalit. 2016. The Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Salts of Organic Acid on Production Performance of Laying Hens. Veterinary World. 9(12): 1478-1484.
  8. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. 2019. Statistik Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan 2019. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan.
  9. El-Badry, A.S.O., M.M. Hassanane, E.S. Ahmed and K.H. El-Kholy. 2009. Effect of Early-Age Acclimation on Some Physiological, Immunological Responses and Chromosomal Aberrations in Muscovy Ducks During Exposure to Heat Stress. Global J. Biotech. and Biochem. 4: 152-159.
  10. Fouad, A.M., D. Ruan, Y.C. Lin, C.T. Zheng, H.X. Zhang, W. Chen, S. Wang, W.G. Xia and Y. Li. 2016. Effects of Dietary Methionine on Performance, Egg Quality and Glutathione Redox System in Egg-Laying Ducks. British Poultry Science. 57(6): 818–823.
  11. Giri, S.C., S.K. Sahoo, S.K. Karna, S. Saran, K.V.H. Sastry and N. Kandi. 2014. Production Performance of Ducks under Extensive System of Management in Tribal Districts of Odisha. Indian Journal of Poultry Science. 49(1): 97-100.
  12. Hastuti, D., R. Prabowo and A.A. Syihabudin. 2018. Tingkat Hen Day Production (HDP) and Break Event Point (BEP) Usaha Ayam Ras petelur (Gallus sp). Jurnal Agrifo. 3(2): 76-84.
  13. Ismoyowati, D. Indrasanti and I.H. Sulistyawan. 2018. The Differences of Feed Quality and Egg Production Performance of Tegal and Magelang Ducks on Farming in Central Java. Bulletin of Animal Science, 42(3):197-202.
  14. Ismoyowati and D. Purwantini. 2013. Produksi Dan Kualitas Telur Native duck Di Daerah Sentra Duck farming Egg Production and Quality of Local Ducks in Ducks Farming Center Area. Jurnal Pembangunan Pedesaan, 13(1): 1-10.
  15. Ismoyowati and J. Sumarmono, 2019. Duck Production for Food Security. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 372 (2019) 012070. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/372/1/012070.
  16. Jones, T.A. and M.S. Dawkins. 2010. Environment and Management Factors Affecting Pekin Duck Production and Welfare on Commercial Farms in the UK. British Poultry Science. 51(1): 12-21.
  17. Ketaren, P.P. and L.H. Prasetyo. 2002a. Pengaruh Pemberian Pakan Terbatas terhadap Duck egg production Silang Mojosari X Alabio (MA): 1. Masa Bertelur Fase Pertama Umur 20-43 Minggu. JITV. 7(1): 38-45.
  18. Ketaren, P.P. and L.H. Prasetyo. 2002b. Pengaruh Pemberian Pakan Terbatas Terhadap Produktivitas Itik Silang Mojosari X Alabio (MA): 2. Masa Bertelur Fase Kedua Umur 44-67 Minggu. JITV. 7(2): 76-83.
  19. Li, W., J. Yuan, Z. Ji, L. Wang, C. Sun and X. Yang. 2018. Correlation Search Between Growth Performance and Flock Activity in Automated Assessment of Pekin Duck Stocking Density. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 15(2): 26-31
  20. Lin, H., H.C. Jiao, J. Buyse and E. Decuypere. 2006. Strategies for Preventing Heat Stress In Poultry. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 62: 71 – 85.
  21. Manurung J.P., E. Suprijatna and V. Dwi. 2019. Pengaruh Pemberian Tepung Limbah Rumput Laut (Gracilaria sp.) dengan Aditif Multienzim dalam Pakan Terhadap Produksi Tegal duck. Jurnal Pengembangan Penyuluhan Peternakan. 16(29): 70-79.
  22. Novi, M. 2019. Development Strategy of Duck Livestock In Semangga District Merauke Regency. Agricola. 9(2): 74-80.
  23. Qurniawan, A., I.I. Arief and R. Afnan. 2016. Perormans Produksi Ayam Pedaging pada Lingkungan Pemeliharaan dengan Ketinggian yang Berbeda di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Veteriner. 17(4): 622-633
  24. Ratriyanto, A., B.F. Hidayat, N. Widyas and S. Prastowo. 2019. Kurva Egg production di Awal Masa Peneluran pada Puyuh yang diberi Ransum dengan Kandungan Protein Berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak Universitas Padjadjaran. 19(1): 28-35.
  25. Rohimah, E. Dihansih and D. Kardaya. 2017. Production Performance of Male Local Ducks (Anas plathyrhinchos) Given Betel (Piper Betle Linn) Leave Extract Solution Included in Commercial Ration. Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara. 3(1): 17-22.
  26. Samsudin A.A., N. Hendry and K.T. Khaing. 2016. Effects of Feeding Dietary Palm Kernel Cake on Eff Production and Egg Quality of Khaki Campbell Duck. Journal of World’s Poultry Research. 6(1): 01-05.
  27. Shoimah, D., I.H. Djunaidi and O. Sjofjan. 2019. Quality of Duck Eggs Maintained Using a Different Maintenance System in the Malang Raya Area. International Research Journal of Advance Engineering and Science. 4(4): 273-277.
  28. Subagja, H., B. Prasetyo and H. Nurjanah. 2017. Faktor Produksi Usaha Ternak Itik Petelur Semi Intensif di Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Ilmiah Inovasi. 17(2): 67-72
  29. Subiharta, D.M. Yuwono and P. Sudrajad. 2013. Karakteristik Tegal duck (Anas plantyhynchos javanicus) Sebagai Itik Petelur Unggulan Lokal Central Java and Upaya Peningkatan Produksinya. Seminar Nasional: Menggagas Kebangkitan Komoditas Unggulan Lokal Pertanian and Kelautan. Universitas Trunojaya Madura. 300-310.
  30. Sulistyawan, I.H., Ismoyowati and D. Indrasanti. 2018. Perbedaan Produksi Dan Kualitas Duck eggs Tegal Dan Magelang duck Di Tingkat Peternak. In Prosiding Seminar Teknologi Agribisnis Peternakan (Stap) Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman. 6(pp): 205-209.
  31. Susanti, A.E., A. Prabowo and S. Hanapi. 2016. Potensi Pakan di Rawa Lebak untuk Mendukung Budidaya Itik Pegagan Studi Kasus di Desa Kota Daro II. In Seminar Nasional Pertanian Peternakan Terpadu. 1(1).
  32. Talukder, S., T. Islam, S. Sarker and M. Islam. 2010. Effect of Environment on Layer Performance. Journal Bangladesh Agriculture University. 8(2): 253-258.
  33. Thiele, H.H. and B. Alletru. 2017. Feed Efficiency and Feeding Behaviour in Pekin Ducks. Lohman Information. 5(12): 30-35.
  34. Toth, L.A., R.A. Trammell and M.I. Woods. 2015. Interactions Between Housing Density and Ambient Temperature in the Cage Environment Effect on Mouse Physiology and Behavior. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. 54(6): 708-717.
  35. Wang, S., W. Chen, H.X. Zhang, D. Ruan and Y.C. Lin. 2015. Influence of Particle Size and Calcium Source on Production Performance, Egg Quality, and Bone Parameters in Laying Ducks. Poultry Science. 93:2560–2566.
  36. Widianto, B., H.S. Prayogi and N. Nuryadi. 2015. Pengaruh Penambahan Tepung Buah Mengkudu (Morinda citrifolia L.) dalam Pakan Terhadap Penampilan Produksi Itik Hibrida. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan. 25(2): 28-35.
  37. Widiawati, Y., R. Sutrisna and Siswanto. 2016. Respon Fisiologis Itik Mojosari Jantan dengan Pemberian Ransum Berkadar Protein Kasar Berbeda. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan Terpadu. 4(3): 182-187.
  38. Widiyaningrum, P., Lisdiana and N.R. Utami. 2016. Egg Production and Hatchability of Local Ducks Unnder Semi Intensive Vs Extensive Managements. Journal Indonesian Tropic Animal Agriculture. 41(2): 77–82.
  39. Ying, Z., L.X. Mei, Z. Min-hong and F. Jing-hai. 2019. Effect of Relative Humidity at Either Acute or Chronic Moderate Temperature on Growth Performance and Droppings’ Corticosterone Metabolites of Broilers. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 18(1): 152-159
  40. Zahan, M.N., M.K.N.B. Sufian, M.K. Rahman and M.S. Parvej. 2016. Socio Economic Status of Farmers and Production Performance of Khaki Campbell Ducks Reared Under Backyard Farming in Bangladesh. Wayamba Journal of Animal Science. 8: 1307-1311.
  41. Zhang, Y.N., S. Wang, K.C. Li, D. Ruan, W. Chen, W.G. Xia, S.L. Wang, K.F.M. Abouelezz and C.T. Zheng. 2020. Estimation of Dietary Zinc Requirement for Laying Duck Breeders: Effects on Productive and Reproductive Performance, Egg Quality, Tibial Characteristics, Plasma Biochemical and Antioxidant Indices, and Zinc Deposition. Poultry Science. 99(1): 454-462.