Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 9509 Download : 527

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the effect of SOYXYL as one of the dietary protected protein supplement product in the rations on the reproduction performance of Simmental bulls. Twelve 5 years-old Simmental bulls were allotted to 4 treatment groups with 3 replications in each, i.e.: T0= control ration (elephant grass + 5 kg/head/day commercial concentrate), T1= control ration + 150 g protected protein supplement SOYXYL (3% of concentrate), T2 = control ration + 300 g SOYXYL (6% of concentrate) and T3= control ration + 450 g SOYXYL (9% of concentrate). The experiment lasted for 90 days. At the end of the experiment, semen and blood were collected and body weight gain was measured. The variables measured included sperm motility, sperm concentration, blood protein, blood urea and the concentration of testosterone. Results showed that SOYXYL supplementation, particularly at the levels of 3 and 6%, increased the total plasma protein of bulls. SOYXYL supplementation at 3% from concentrate resulted in increased plasma urea concentration. Feeding SOYXYL, particularly at the levels of 6 and 9%, increased the average daily gain of bulls as compared to control. Feeding 3% SOYXYL increased, but at the levels of 6 and 9% decreased the concentration of sperm of bulls. The concentration of testosterone was higher in the bulls received 3 and 6% SOYXYL in the rations. Dietary supplementation of SOYXYL increased the sperm motility of Simmental bulls. In conclusion, dietary supplementation of SOYXYL at the level of 3% increased plasma protein, testosterone, and sperm concentrations as well as sperm motility. However, supplementation of SOYXYL at 6 and 9% from rations decreased the concentrations of sperm and testosterone.

Keywords

bulls rumen protected protein reproduction sperm quality testosterone

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before or is under consideration for publication elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract). When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.

How to Cite
Prasetiyono, B. W. H. E., Widiyanto, W., Ondho, Y. S., Subrata, A., & Widodo, H. S. (2020). Effect of SOYXYL as a Dietary Protected Protein Supplement on the Reproductive Performance of Simmental Bulls. ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 22(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2020.22.1.41
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Aboozar M and F Niazi. 2013. Effects of rumen undegradable protein on productive performance and N balance of Holstein cows in early post-partum period. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 3: 657-665. http://ijas.iaurasht.ac.ir/article_513422_104bbb701fba3a8a2cfc68668056dfb4.pdf
  2. Ahlman B, M Charlton, A Fu, C.Berg , P O’Brien and KS Nair.2001. Insulin’s effect on synthesis rates of liver proteins. A swine model comparing various precursors of protein synthesis. Diabetes 50: 947-954. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.50.5.947
  3. Charidemou E, T Ashmore, X Li, BD McNally, JAWest, S Liggi, M Harvey, E Orford and JL Griffin. 2019. A randomized 3-way crossover study indicates that high-protein feeding induces de novo lipogenesis in healthy humans. JCI Insight. 4(12): 124819. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.124819
  4. Cheah Y and W Yang. 2011. Functions of essential nutrition for high quality spermatogenesis. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2: 182-197. doi:10.4236/abb.2011.24029
  5. Elmaz O, U Cirit , U Keser , K Gürbulak , K Güvenç and C Kutay. 2007. Effect of two dietary protein levels on testosterone, testicular parameters and semen quality in ram lambs during pubertal development. Med. Wet. 63: 1177-1180.
  6. Gorissen SHM, JJR Crombag, JMG Senden, WAH Waterval, J Bierau, LB Verdijk and LJCV Loon. 2018. Protein content and amino acid composition of commercially available plant-based protein isolates. Amino Acids. 50: 1685–1695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-018-2640-5
  7. Hosseini B and G Eslamian. 2014. Association of dietary factors with male and female infertility: review of current evidence. Thrita 3(3): e20953. https://doi.org/10.5812/thrita.20953
  8. Hristov AN, A Bannink, LA Crompton, P Huhtanen, M Kreuzer, M McGee, P Nozière, CK Reynolds, AR Bayat, DR Yáñez-Ruiz, J Dijkstra, E Kebreab, A Schwarm, KJ Shingfield and Z Yu. 2019. Invited review: Nitrogen in ruminant nutrition: A review of measurement techniques. J. Dairy Sci. 102: 5811-5852. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15829
  9. Hungate RE. 1966. The Rumen and Its Microbes. Academic Press, New York.
  10. Irfan IZ, A Esfandiari and C Choliq. 2014. Profil protein total, albumin, globulin dan rasio albumin dan globulin sapi pejantan. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner 19(2): 123-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v19i2.1040 (article in Indonesian language)
  11. Kamalak A, Ö Canbolat, Y Gurbuz and O Özay. 2005. Protected protein and amino acids in ruminant nutrition. KSU. J. Scie. Eng. 8(2)-2005.
  12. Kelly DM and TH Jones. 2013. Testosterone: a metabolic hormone in health and disease. J. Endocrinol. 217: R25-45. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-12-0455
  13. Kumar R, D Kar, D Kumar, V Singh and S Sihag. 2018. Effect of rumen protected amino acids and fish meal on feed conversion ratio of Murrah buffalo heifers. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7: 2587-2595. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.703.299
  14. Lapierre H and GE Lobley. 2001. Nitrogen recycling in the ruminant: A Review. J. Dairy Sci. 84(E. Suppl.):E223-E236 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70222-6
  15. Ma H, J Cheng, X Zhu and Z Jia. 2011. Effects of rumen-protected tryptophan on performance, nutrient utilization and plasma tryptophan in cashmere goats. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10: 5806-5811. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.393
  16. Maidin MS, NF Adanan, MT Aminudina and A Tawang. 2014. In vitro supplements improves motility and progressive score of spermatozoa in Jermasia goats. APCBEE Procedia 8: 329-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.03.049
  17. Patricio A, DF Cruz, JV Silva, A Padrão, BR Correia, L Korrodi-Gregório, R Ferreira, N Maia, S Almeida, J Lourenço, V Silva and M Fardilha. 2016. Relation between seminal quality and oxidative balance in sperm cellsRelação entre a qualidade seminal e o equilíbrio oxidativo nos espermatozoides. Acta Urol. Port. 33: 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acup.2015.10.001
  18. Prasetiyono BWHE, A Subrata, BIM Tampoebolon, Surono, and Widiyanto.2018. In vitro ruminal degradability of soybean meal protein protected with natural tannin. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 119(1). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/119/1/012016
  19. Prasetiyono BWHE, Suryahadi, T Toharmat and R Syarief. 2007. Strategi suplementasi protein ransum sapi potong berbasis jerami dan dedak padi. Med. Pet. 30: 207-217. http://medpet.journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/mediapeternakan/article/view/946
  20. Radostits OM, CC Gay, KW Hinchcliff and PD Constable. 2007. Veterinary Medicine: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, sheep, pigs, goats, and horses 10 Edition, Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  21. Rato L, MG Alves, S Socorro, AI Duarte, JE Cavaco and PF Oliveira. 2012. Metabolic regulation is important for spermatogenesis. Nat. Rev. Urol. 9: 330-338. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.77
  22. Rekwot PI, EO Oyedipe, PM Dawuda and VO Sekoni.1997. Age and hourly related changes of serum testosterone and spermatogenesis of prepubertal bulls fed two levels of nutrition. Vet. J. 153: 341-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-0233(97)80068-8
  23. Roseler DK, JD Ferguson, CJ Sniffen and J Herrema. 1993. Dietary protein degradability effect on milk urea nitrogen and non protein nitrogen in Holstein cows. J. Diary Sci. 58: 525-534. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77372-5
  24. SAS. 2009. SAS User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc, SAS Campus Drive, Cary, NC 27513.
  25. Shelke SK, SS Thakur and SM Shete. 2012. Protected nutrients technology and the impact of feeding protected nutrients to dairy animals: a review. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 7: 51-62. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijds.2012.51.62
  26. Shimizu A, T Mitani, S Tanaka, H Fujii, M Maebuchi, Y Amiya, Y Tanaka, Y Matsui, S Nakamura and S Katayama. 2018. Soybean-derived glycine-arginine dipeptide administration promotes neurotrophic factor expression in the mouse brain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66: 7935-7941. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01581
  27. Steward GS and CP Smith. 2005. Urea nitrogen salvage mechanisms and their relevance to ruminants, non-ruminants and man. Nutr. Res. Rev. 18: 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR200498
  28. Tedeschi LO, DG Fox, MA Fonseca and LFL Cavalcanti. 2015. Models of protein and amino acid requirements for cattle. Rev. Bras. Zoo. 44(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902015000300005
  29. Toelihere MR. 1993. Inseminasi Buatan pada Ternak. Penerbit Angkasa, Bandung (article in Indonesian language)
  30. Uddin MJ, ZH Khandaker, MJ Khan and MMH Khan. 2015. Dynamic of microbial protein synthesis in the rumen – A Review. Ann. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2: 116-131. http://naturepub.org/index.php/journal/navas
  31. Voller A, DE Bidwell and A Bartlett. 1989. The enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Elisa). A guide with abstract of microplate aplications. Proc. Zool. Soc. London; 1989. pp: 506-512.
  32. Yasothai R. 2014. Importance of protein on reproduction in dairy cattle. Int. J. Sci. Environ. Technol. 3: 2081-2083. http://www.ijset.net/journal/450.pdf