Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 351 Download : 221

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea L.) is leguminous species that contain high nutritional values. This study aimed to determine the effect of the rate of urea fertilizer and harvest age on the productivity of butterfly pea forage. This research used a split-plot design consisting of urea rates (0, 100, and 200 kg/ha) and harvest ages (30, 45, and 60 days after planting or DAP) with three replications. The variables observed were morphological growth (plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves, and number of branches), and productivity of forage biomass (fresh weight, dry weight, and crude protein). The data obtained were analyzed using ANOVA and the means were separated by using Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT). The interaction between fertilizer rates and harvest ages was shown (p<0.05) on stem diameter, number of leaves, number of branches, and fresh weight of butterfly pea. The increased rates of fertilizer and harvest ages significantly affected (p<0.05) in the morphological growth and productivity of butterfly pea biomass. The application of urea fertilizer increased plant length from 10.59 to 17.16%, stem diameter from 12.12 to 24.24%, number of leaves from 15.40 to 28.20%, and number of branches from 81.82 to 190.91% compared to control. It was concluded that the morphological growth and productivity of forage biomass increased with fertilizer rates and harvest ages. Treatment of 200 kg/ha urea and harvest age of 60 DAP produced the highest morphological and productivity.

Keywords

Clitoria ternatea harvest ages morphology productivity urea fertilizer umur panen morfologi produktivitas urea

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before or is under consideration for publication elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract). When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.

How to Cite
Wardi, W., Umami, N., Kurniawati, A., Suhartanto, B., Hanim, C., & Adyatama, Z. (2023). Productivity of Butterfly Pea (Clitoria ternatea L.) Influenced by Urea Fertilizer Rates and Harvest Ages in Kulon Progo, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 25(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2023.25.1.187
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abreu, MLC, RAM Vieira, NS Rocha, RP Araujo, LS Glória, AM Fernandes, PD de Lacerda, AG Jứnior, and A Gesualdi. 2014. Clitoria ternatea L. as A Potential High Quality Forage Legume. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 27(2):169–178.
  2. Al-Snafi, AE. 2016. Pharmacological Importance of Clitoria ternatea- a review. IOSR Journal Pharmacy. 6(3):68–83.
  3. AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. (18th ed.). Association of Officiating Analytical Chemists.
  4. Arnawa, IW., IW Suarna, and IG Mahardika. 2017. Growth and Yield of Butterfly Pea (Clitoria ternatea L.) on Various Level of Water Content and Bio-slurry Fertilizers. Pastura. 7(1):41–46.
  5. Astuti, D, B Suhartanto, N Umami, and A Irawan. 2020. Effect of Density Between Intercropped Sorghum and Stylosanthes on Biomass Production and Quality Under Varying NPK Fertilizer Application Rates. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology. 23(3):197–205.
  6. Astuti, M. 1980. Desain Penelitian dan Analisis Statistik [Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis]. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
  7. Bui, F, MA Lelang, and RI Taolin. 2015. Effect Of Planting Media Composition and Polybag Size on Tomato Growth and Yield (Licopercicum escelentum, Mill). Savana Cendana Jurnal Pertanian Konservasi Lahan Kering. 1(1):1–7.
  8. Dianita, R and L Abdullah. 2011. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Growth Characteristics and Productivity of Creeping Forage Plants For tree-pasture integrated system. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 1(8):1118-1121.
  9. Djuwanti, S., HB Pulonggono, and Suwarno. 2007. Pengaruh Pemberian Bahan Organik Fosfat Alam Terhadap Aktifitas Fosfatase dan Fraksi P Tanah Latosol Di Dermaga, Bogor. Jurnal Tanah dan LIngkungan. 9(1): 10-15.
  10. Gomez, SM., and A Kalamani. 2003. Butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea): A Nutritive Multipurpose Forage Legume For The Tropics. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2(6):374–379.
  11. Hartutik, Soebarinoto, PT Fernandez, and S Ratnawaty. 2012. Evaluation of Legume Herbs Nutritive Value As a Ruminant Feed and Nitrogen Supply on Soil in West Timor, Indonesia. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research. 25(4):323–331.
  12. Jamil, N., MNM Zairi, A Nasim, and F Pa’ee. 2018. Influences of Environmental Conditions to Phytoconstituents in Clitoria ternatea (Butterfly Pea Flower). Journal of Science and Technology. 10(2):208-228.
  13. Jelantik, I., T Nikolaus, C Penu, G Malelak, and I Benu. 2019. Forage Production and Nutritive Value of (Clitoria ternatea) Harvested at 60, 75 and 90 Days After Planting. Pastura. 8(2):76–80.
  14. Karim, AB., ER Rhodes, and PS Savill. 1991. Effect of Cutting Height and Cutting Interval on Dry Matter Yield of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam) De Wit. Agroforestry Systems. 16(2):129-137.
  15. Meteorological, Climatological, and Geophysical Agency. 2021. Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika online. BMKG.
  16. Morsy, ASM., and A Awadalla. 2017. Growth, Forage Yield and Quality of Clitoria (Clitoria ternatea) as Affected by Dates and Methods of Sowing and Phosphorus Fertilizer Under Toshka Region Condition. Middle East Journal Agriculture Research. 6(2):506–518.
  17. Nasim, NM., and F Pa’ee. 2021. Evaluating Physiological Responses of Butterfly Pea, Clitoria ternatea L. var. Pleniflora to Salt Stress. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 736(1):012039.
  18. Oguis, GK., EK Gilding, MA Jackson, and DJ Craik. 2019. Butterfly Pea (Clitoria ternatea L.) a Cyclotide-bearing Plant With Applications in Agriculture and Medicine. Frontiers in Plant Science. 10(1):1–3.
  19. Prakoso, DI., D Indradewa, and E Sulistyaningsih. 2018. Pengaruh Dosis Urea Terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Kedelai (Glycine max L. Merr.) Kultivar Anjasmoro. Vegetalika. 7(3):16–29.
  20. Prasojo, YS., G Ishigaki, M Hashiguchi, M Muguerza, and R Akashi. 2021. Evaluation of Regrowth Ability of Soybeans for Forage Utilization Under Two-Cutting Systems. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 15(12):1452–1458.
  21. Prayoga, IK., F Fathul, and Liman. 2018. Pengaruh Perbedaan Umur Panen Terhadap Produktivitas (Produksi Segar, Produksi Bahan Kering, serta Proporsi Daun dan Batang) Hijauan Indigofera zollingeriana. Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Peternakan. 2(1):1–7.
  22. Purba, EC. 2020. Kembang Telang (Clitoria ternatea L.): Pemanfaatan dan Bioaktivitas. Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika dan Sains. 4(2):111–124.
  23. Rizqiani, NF., A Ambarwati, and NW Yuwono. 2007. Pengaruh Dosis dan Frekuensi Pemberian Pupuk Organik Cair Terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Buncis (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Dataran Rendah. Jurnal Ilmu Tanah dan Lingkungan 7:43-53.
  24. Sarmita, F., ED Hastuti, and S Haryanti. 2011. Pertumbuhan Legum Pada Ketinggian Yang Berbeda. Bioma: Berkala Ilmiah Biologi. 13(2):67–72.
  25. Sembiring, SDBJ., N Ginting, S Umar, and S Ginting. 2021. Effect of Eco Enzymes Concentration on Growth and Production of Kembang Telang Plant (Clitoria ternatea L.) as Animal Feed. Jurnal Peternakan Integratif. 9(1):36–46.
  26. Statistics of Kulon Progo Regency. 2021. Kulon Progo Regency in Figures For 2021.
  27. Sulaeman, Suparto, and Eviati. 2005. Analisis Kimia Tanah, Tanaman, Air, dan Pupuk. Petunjuk Teknis. Balai Penelitian Tanah. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian Departemen Pertanian. Bogor.
  28. Sutedi, E. 2013. Potensi kembang telang (Clitoria ternatea L.) sebagai tanaman pakan ternak. Wartazoa. 23(2): 51-62.
  29. Syamsuddin, S, T Saili, and A Hasan. 2016. Hubungan Pemberian Pupuk Kandang Sapi Dengan Peningkatan Legum Clitoria ternatea Sebagai Hijauan Pakan Ternak. Jurnal Ilmu Teknologi Peternakan Tropis. 3(2):81–86.
  30. Umami, N., A Abdiyansah, and A Agus. 2019. Effects of Different Doses of NPK Fertilization on Growth and Productivity of Cichorium intybus. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 387(1):012097.
  31. Umami, N., YS Prasojo, and MS Haq. 2022. Morphological Characteristics and Biomass Production Brassica rapa var. Marco During the Dry Season. Animal Production. 24(1) :31-36.
  32. Utami, SNH., and S Handayani. 2003. Sifat Kimia pada Estisol Sistim Pertanian Organik. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian. 10(2): 63-69.
  33. Utomo, R., CT Noviandi, N Umami, and A Permadi. 2019. Effect of Composted Animal Manure as Fertilizer on Productivity of Azolla pinnata Grown in Earthen Ponds. Journal of Biological Sciences Original Research Paper. 19(4):232-236.
  34. Wafi, H., S Sowmen, Q Aini, and E Yulita. 2020. Pemanfaatan waretha sebagai bakteri pelarut posfat dan pupuk npk terhadap akar dan produksi clitoria ternatea di ultisoL. Pastura, 10(1), 10-22.
  35. Winata, NASH., K Karno, and S Sutarno. 2012. Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Gamal (Gliricidia sepium) Dengan Berbagai Dosis Pupuk Organik Cair. Animal Agriculture Journal. 1(1):797–807.
  36. Zulchi, T., A Husni, and Fransiska. 2020. Hasil Ploidisasi Kembang Telang (Clitoria ternatea L.) Terhadap Produksi Biomas. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner Virtual 2020. Puslitbangnak Litbang Kemntan. Bogor.