Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 474 Download : 278

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to determine morphological, adaptability, and biomass production of Brassica rapa var. Marco planted in Karang Malang, Yogyakarta, Indonesia during the dry season. The seeds used were the introduced feed plants Brassica rapa var. Pillar from Crop Mark Seed Company New Zealand. The seeds were spread in 1 m2 plots. Each plant had 3 replicates at the end of rainy season (March) and defoliation in September. The variables observed in this study were plant growth and plant morphology. Also, biomass production, dry matter (DM), and organic matter (OM) content of each plant were statistically analyzed by independent sample t-test. Biomass production was taken from the first and second defoliation (first regrowth). The plant morphology showed that the plants could develop well. The plant growth showed that dry matter production of Brassica rapa var. Pillar was 1.15 tonnes/ha/year. The first and second defoliation of Brassica rapa var. Marco produced 1.61 tonnes/ha (DM 9.89% and OM 79.99) and 2.47 tones/ha (DM 9.17% and OM 84.82%), respectively, indicating significant difference. It can be concluded that the varieties of Brassica rapa var. Marco can thrive when planted during the dry season in Yogyakarta.

Keywords

Brassica rapa var. Pillar Brassica rapa var. Marco adaptability morphology production

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before or is under consideration for publication elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract). When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.

How to Cite
Umami, N., Prasojo, Y. S., & Haq, M. S. (2022). Morphological Characteristics and Biomass Production Brassica rapa var. Marco During the Dry Season. ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 24(1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2022.24.1.107
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. AOAC. 2005. Official Method of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemistry. 18th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington DC.
  2. Ayres L and B Clements. 2002. Forage brassicas: quality crops for livestock production. Agfact. 1(13): 1–3.
  3. Collins M, CJ Nelson, KJ Moore, and RF Barner, R. F. 2017. Forages, Volume 1: an Introduction to Grassland Agruculture, 7th Edition. Willey-Blackwell.
  4. Cropmark Seed CM. 2015. High-yielding Pasture and Forage Seeds from Cropmark Seeds-Driving Productivity. Fieldays Online. (Accessed: Mei 28, 2020).
  5. El-Sherbeny SE, SF Hendawy, AA Youssef, NY Naguib, and MS Hussein. 2012. Response of turnip (Brassica rapa) plants to minerals or organic fertilizers treatments. Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 8(2): 628–634.
  6. Judson HG, DG Ferguson, MK Cutts, and AJE Moorhead. 2013. Liveweight gain of lambs grazing three forage rapes which differ in total dry matter yield. In: Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 257–260. https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2013.75.2908
  7. Jung GA, RE Kocher, and A Glica. 1984. Minimum‐Tillage Forage Turnip and Rape Production on Hill Land as Influenced by Sod Suppression and Fertilizer 1. Agronomy Journal. 76(3): 404–408.
  8. Macara, GR. 2014. The Climate and Weather of Canterbury. NIWA Science and Technology Series, 68, 44.
  9. Maludin AJ, MS Lum, M Mohd Lassim, and J Gobilik. 2020. Optimal plant density, nutrient concentration and rotzone temperature for higher growth and yield of Brassica rapa L. Curly Dwarf Pak Choy'in raft hydroponic system under tropic climate. Transactions on Science and Technology. 7(3):178-188.
  10. Munasik, CI Sutrisno, S Anwar, and CH Prayitno. 2012. The Growth, Yield and Quality of Elephant Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) Specific Tolerant of Acid
  11. Soils by Mutagenesis with Ethyl methane Sulfonate. Animal Production. 14(2):87-91.
  12. Purbajanti ED, S Anwar, S Widyati, and F Kusmiyati. 2009. Kandungan Protein dan Serat Kasar Rumput Benggala (Panicum Maximum) dan Rumput Gajah (Pennisetum Purpureum) pada Cekaman Stres Kering. 11 (2): 109‐115.
  13. Siddiqui MH, F Mohammad, MMA Khan, and MH Al-Whaibi. 2012. Cumulative effect of nitrogen and sulphur on Brassica juncea L. genotypes under NaCl stress. Protoplasma. 249(1):139–153.
  14. Westwood CT. 2012. Nutritional evaluation of five species of forage brassica. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 31–37.
  15. Zhao J, AE Xiaowu, W Ae, BD Ae, P Lou, J Wu, AE Rifei, S Ae, Z Xu, AE Jaap, V Maarten, K Ae, and G Bonnema. 2005. Genetic relationships within Brassica rapa as inferred from AFLP fingerprints. Theor Appl Genet. 110: 1301–1314.