Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the welfare and performance of Bali cattle transported by Camara Nusantara vessel. We observed five-day transporting of 30 Bali cattle (1-2 years old, 100-200kg body weight) from cattle loading at Tenau Port, Kupang and cattle handling during sea transportation to cattle unloading at Tanjung Priok Port, Jakarta. The measured parameters were cattle’s physiological responses, including body surface temperature, foaming (excessive foam around their mouth), respiration (respiration rate during transportation), and panting (any panting behavior during the transport). The behavioral responses measured in this study were feeding behavior (do cattle eat normally during transportation process), lying (can cattle lie normally), agonistic interaction (mounting, head fighting, etc.), freeze during the loading/ unloading process (stop walking during loading and unloading process), coercion (cattle was hit during loading and unloading process), and slip/fall (cattle slipped or fell during loading and unloading process). The welfare evaluation was carried out by scoring system on the observed parameters. The result showed that the cattle showed a normal physiological response, except their body surface temperature was slightly above normal, i.e., 32-35oC. The cattle also showed normal behavior responses except for coercion. The average score gets from this study was 2.5, indicative of slightly poor physiology and behavior when cattle being transported.

Keywords

cattle’s phisiology behaviour cattle transportation camara nusantara vessel

Article Details

How to Cite
Wibawanti, S. D., Yamin, M., Afnan, R., & Priyanto, R. (2021). Cattle’s Physiology and Behavior Responses Which Transported by Camara Nusantara Vessel . ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 23(3), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2021.23.3.13

References

  1. Animal Health Australia. 2016. Australian Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines for cattle. 1st Ed. www.animalwelfarestandards.net.au. (Accessed 29 March 2019).
  2. Australian Standard for Export of Libvestock. 2011. Australian position statement on the export of livestock. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry, Canberra, Australia. 132 pages
  3. Broom, D.M. 2010. Effects of dairy cattle breeding and production methods on animal welfare. Proc. 21st World Buiatrics Congress, 1-7. Punta del Este, Uruguay: World Association for Buiatics
  4. Eley, T. 2011. The health Cow. https://www.nadis.org.uk/disease-a-z/cattle/the-healthy-cow/ (accesed 29 January 2019)
  5. Gallo, C., S. Perez, C. Sanhueza, and J. Gasic. 2000. Efectos del tiempo de transporte de novillos previo al faenamiento sobre el comportamiento, las perdidas de peso y algunas caracteristicas de la canal. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria. 32: 157–170.
  6. Ganong. 1983. Review of Medical Physiology. Ed ke-11. California: Lange Medical Publication.
  7. Grandin, T. 2007. Livestock Handling and Transportat. 3rd Ed., CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire
  8. Grandin, T. 2014. Livestock Handling and Transport: Theories and Applications. 4th ed. CABI Publ., Wallingford, UK.
  9. Jones, R.B., D.G. Satterlee, F.H. Ryder. 1994. Fear of humans in Japanese quail selected for low or high adrenocortical response. Physiol. Behav. 56, 379–383.
  10. Lysyk, T.J. 2008. Effects of Ambient Temperature and Cattle Skin Temperature on Engorgement of Dermacentor andersoni. J. Med. Entomol. 45(6): 1000-1006
  11. Ministry for Primary Insdustries of New Zealand. 2013. Guidance Material for the Transport of Cattle by Sea. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/ exporting/animals/live-animals/requirement-documents-for-exporting-live-animals/animal-welfare-export-certificates/live-sheep-and-cattle-export-voyage-reports/. (Accessed 29 March 2019)
  12. Ohnstand, I. 2016. Managing heat stress in Dairy Cow. https://www.nadis.org.uk/disease-a-z/cattle/managing-heat-stress-in-dairy-cows/ (accesed 29 January 2019)
  13. Dahl, P.K., L. Foldager, M.S. Herskin, H. Houe, and P.T. Thompsen. 2018. Lameness scoring and assessment of fitness for transport in dairy cows. Res Vet Sci.;119:162-166
  14. Warris, P.D. 1990. The Handling of Cattle pre-slaughter and its effect on carcass and meat quality. Applied Anim Behaviour Sci, 28: 171-186
  15. Welfare Quality®. 2009. Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands.

Most read articles by the same author(s)