Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 556 Download : 532

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

In general, the determination of the price of cattle is based on the condition of the cattle's body. This will result in an unsatisfactory transfer of revenue value for farmers, because the bargaining position is still weak. In addition, transactions in the marketing chain of beef products and their by-products have not yet been solidly established, so the obligations and rights of some parties are not guaranteed. The objective was to analyze the role of stakeholders in each supply chain and distribution of value chains as revenue in the marketing transactions of cattle, beef, and derivative products. The study was conducted in West Timor, which has 85.0% of the cattle population in NTT. Four sample districts (Kupang, TTS, TTU and Belu) in 8 sample sub-districts or 16 sample villages were included in the study. Respondents in marketing activities consisted of farmers, village traders, sub-district/district traders, slaughter traders, inter-island traders, by-product/waste traders, as well as beef, cowhide, bone, and fat/blood processing industries. Data collection were conducted by a questionnaire-based interview. The data were analyzed descriptively-quantitatively with a supply chain analysis model.  It canbe concluded that (1) Market supply chains include cattle traders (farmers, village traders, sub-district traders, inter-island traders and slaughtering traders), as well as beef traders (fresh beef retailers, frozen beef exporting traders, and processed beef products traders); (2) The ideal model of the value chain in the form of revenue share from marketing of cattle, beef, processed beef products, by-products, and cattle waste has not been fully established in NTT; (3) The ideal model includes five marketing blocks (cattle block, beef block, processed beef block, by-product block, and waste block).

Keywords

market chains supply chains value chains beef cattle marketing

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before or is under consideration for publication elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract). When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.

How to Cite
Lole, U. R., Keban, A., Sogen, J. G., & Mulyantini, N. G. A. (2021). Supply and Value Chain Models in Cattle Marketing and Its Derivative Products in East Nusa Tenggara Province. ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 23(3), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2021.23.3.110
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Budisantoso, E., J. Triastono, P. Fernandez, H. Marawali and C. Deblitz. 2008. Strategies to Reduce Weight Loss in Inter-Island Trade. ACIAR SMAR 2007/202. Australia Indonesia Partnership.
  2. Fatahilah, Y.H., Marimin, and Harianto. 2010. Performance analysis of supply chain for beef cattle: Case study at PT Kariyana Gita Utama, Jakarta. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian. 20(3):193–205.
  3. Habaora, F., A.M. Fuah, L. Abdullah, R. Priyanto, A. Yani, and B.P. Purwanto. 2019. Economic analysis of bali cattle farm in Timor Island Indonesia. Intl. J. of Sci. & Tech. Res. 8(10):1576–1582.
  4. Hadi, P.U. 2012. Manajemen rantai pasok ternak dan daging sapi di Nusa Tenggara Timur. Dalam: Bunga Rampai Rantai Pasok Komoditas Pertanian Indonesia d).cky ani sesuai juga dengan kajian sebelumnya oleh8) dan perlu dibenahi berbagai aturan terkait kouta. Lokollo EM (Ed). IPB Press, Bogor. Pp: 265–295.
  5. Hariningsih, E. 2012. Peran teknologi informasi bagi hubungan inter organisasional dalam supply chain management system. Jurnal Bisnis Manajemen dan Akuntansi. 1(1):27–36.
  6. Hayami, Y., T. Kawagoe, Y. Morooka, and M. Siregar. 1987. Agricultural marketing and processing in upland java a perspective from a Sunda village. Bogor: The CPGRT Centre.
  7. Hosami, G.A. 2014. Supply chain management scenario in India. International Journal of Reasearch in Management and Business Studies. 1(3):18–22.
  8. Keban, A., S.S. Niron, and U.R. Lole. 2020. Struktur dan peran kelembagaan rantai pasok pemasaran sapi potong di Kabupaten Kupang Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jurnal Nukleus Peternakan Des 2020. 7(2):139–146.
  9. Krova, M., J.G. Sogen, and M.Y. Luruk. 2018. Alternatif kebijakan pengendalian pemotongan sapi bali betina produktif di Timor Barat. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis. 5(3):50–59
  10. Lalus, M.F., M. Krova, M.R.D. Ratu, and O.H. Nono. 2020. Analisis distribusi margin di antara lembaga-lembaga pemasaran ternak sapi potong di Kabupaten Kupang Nusa Tenggara Timur Jurnal Nukleus Peternakan, 6(2), 63–70.
  11. Lasaharu, N., N.K. Laya, and Y. Boekoesoe. 2020. Analisis pemasaran sapi potong. Jambura J. of Anim. Sci. 2(2):62–75.
  12. Lence, S.H., S. Marette, D.J. Hayes, and W. Foster. 2007. Collective marketing arrangements for geographically differentiated agricultural products: Welfare impacts and policy implications. American Jounal of Agricultural Economics. Malden. Nov 2007. 89(4):947–957.
  13. Lole, U.R. 2012. Model kebijakan kuota interinsular trading dalam rangka peningkatan kesejahteraan petani dan pengembangan populasi sapi di Nusa Tenggara Timur. Laporan penelitian. Lembaga Penelitian Undana, Kupang.
  14. Lole, U.R. and A. Keban. 2020. Policies to increase calves production in East Nusa Tenggara as a national production center. Journal Animal Production. Dec 2020. 22(2):98–104.
  15. Marimin, N. and Maghfiroh. 2011. Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Manajemen Rantai Pasok. Bogor: IPB Press.
  16. Monczka, R,, R.J. Trent, R.B. Handfield. 2011. Purchasing and Suplly Chain Management. 5th Edition. Ohio, South-Western (US): Cengage Learning.
  17. Mutiah, A., A. Abdullah, and S. Nurlaelah. 2018. Identifikasi peranan kelompok sebagai wahana kerja sama pada kelompok peternak sapi potong pada peternakan rakyat. Jurnal Agripet. 18(1):57–62.
  18. Nalle, A.A. and M. Tiro. 2019. Analisis biaya transaksi dalam rantai pasok ternak sapi potong di Timor Barat, Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jurnal Nukleus Peternakan Juni 2019. 6(1):38–46.
  19. Nalle, A.A., B. Hartono, B.A. Nugroho, and H.D. Utami. 2017. Domestic resources cost analysis of small-scale beef cattle farming at upstream area of Benain-Noelmina Watershed, West Timor, East Nusa Tenggara. De Gruyter Open. 2: 417–424
  20. Ningsih, U.W., B. Hartono, and E. Nugroho. 2017. Analisis pemasaran ternak sapi potong melalui analisis marjin, transmisi harga, struktur pemasaran, perilaku pemasaran, dan kinerja pemasaran. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan. 27(1):1–11.
  21. Noach, Y.R. and M.F. Lalus. 2020. Analisis indeks koneksi pasar dan distribusi margin pada lembaga-lembaga pemasaran ternak sapi potong di Kabupaten Kupang Nusa Tenggara Timur. J. Agrimor 5 (1):13-16.
  22. Paul, J. 2014. Panduan Penerapan Transformasi Rantai Suplai dengan Model SCOR. Nurul R, Zalsa AD, Wahyudi H (editor). Jakarta: Penerbit PPM.
  23. Preckel, P.V., A. Gray, M. Boehlje, and S. Kim. 2004. Risk and value chains: participant sharing of risk and rewards. Journal Chain and Network Services. 4(1):25–32.
  24. Priyanto, D. 2011. Strategi pengembangan usaha ternak sapi potong dalam mendukung program swasembada daging sapi dan kerbau tahun 2014. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian. 30(3):108–116.
  25. Purba, H.J. and P.U. Hadi. 2012. Dinamika dan kebijakan pemasaran produk ternak sapi potong di Indonesia Timur. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. 10(4):361–373.
  26. Suryana, A. 2008. Pengembangan usaha ternak sapi potong berorientasi agribisnis dengan pola kemitraan. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian. 28(1):29–37.
  27. Tiro, M., and M.F. Lalus. 2019. Spatial price connectivity in marketing beef cattle in Kupang Regency, Indonesia. Russ. J. of Agric. and Soc.-Econ. Sci. 12(96):182–194.