Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to establish the best proportion of salakleaf silage utilisation in complete feed based on dry matter digestibility, organic matter digestibility, pH value, VFA generation, and NH3 concentration. The method used in this study was experimental with a 4 x 4 Randomized Block Design (RBD), using four distinct treatment ratios and 4 times rumen fluid collection as a repeat group. The percentage of salakleaf treatments in complete feed were: P0 (15% elephant grass in complete feed), P1 (15% salakleaf in complete feed), P2 (30% salakleaves in complete feed) and P3 (45% salak leaves in complete feed). The observed variables consisted of dry matter digestibility, organic matter digestibility, pH value, VFA production, and NH3 concentration. The mathematical model used is an analysis of variance and if there are differences between treatments it is continued with the DMRT (Duncan's Multiple Range Test) test (Steel and Torrie, 1991). The results revealed that the treatment ration had no significant (P>0.05) influence on pH value  and had a very significant effect (P<0.01) on dry matter digestibility, organic matter digestibility, VFA production, and NH3 concentration. This study concluded that using 30% silage of salakleaves in complete feed could maintain the pH value and increase the dry matter digestibility, organic matter digestibility, pH value, VFA production, and NH3 concentration.

Keywords

Salak leaves silage complete feed digestibility fermentation characteristics in vitro

Article Details

How to Cite
Nasution, R. R., Trisna, A., & Ginting, S. P. (2023). The Effect of Salak (Salacca zalacca) Leaf Silage in Complete Feed on Digestibility and Characteristics In vitro Fermantation . ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 25(2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2023.25.2.230

References

  1. Anggrodi, R. 1979. Ilmu Makanan Ternak Umum. PT. Gramedia, Jakarta.
  2. Anitasari, L. 2010. Pengaruh Tingkat Penggunaan Limbah Tape Singkong dalam Ransum terhadap
  3. Kecernaan Bahan Kering dan Bahan Organik Ransum Domba Lokal. Skripsi. Fakultas
  4. Peternakan Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung.
  5. AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. In Association of Official Analytical, Chemists
  6. International, Maryland, USA (Issue February).
  7. Arora, S. P., 1989. Pencernaan Mikroba pada Ruminansia. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
  8. Arora, S.P. 1995. Pencernaan Mikroba pada Hewan Ruminansia. Catatan ke dua. Gadjah Mada
  9. University Press, Yogyakarta. (Diterjemahkan oleh R. Murwati).
  10. Ashenbach, J.R. G.B. Penner, F. Stumpff, and G.Gabel. J. Anim. Sci. 2011. Ruminant Nutrition
  11. Symposium : Role of fermentastion acid absorption in the regulation of ruminal pH. 89:
  12. 1092-1107.
  13. Blummel, M., H. Steingass dan K. Becker. 1997. The relationship between in vitro gas production, in
  14. vitro microbial biomass yield and 15 N incorporation and its implication for the prediction of
  15. voluntary feed intake of roughages. British Journal of Nutrition. Vol. 77 (5): 91-921.
  16. Badan Pusat Statistik Pertanian Hortikultura (BPS, Statistik Pertanian Hortikultura SPH-SBS. 2020.
  17. Kota Padang Sidempuan dalam Angka 2020. Produksi Buah-buahan menurut
  18. Kabupaten/Kota. Diterbitkan oleh BPS Provinsi Sumatera Utara.
  19. BPS Kota Padangsidimpuan. (2021). Statistik Produksi Ternak Besar. padangsidimpuankota.bps.go.id/ statictable /2017/01/17/216/populasi-ternak-besar menurut jenisternak-2010-2015-ekor-.html
  20. Cahyani, R.D., Nuswantoro, L.K. dan Subrata, A. 2012. Pengaruh proteksi protein tepung kedelai
  21. dengan tannin daun bakau terhadap konsentrasi amonia, undergraded protein dan protein
  22. total secara in Vitro. J. Anim. Agric 1(1):159166.
  23. Church, D.C. 1988. Salivari function and production. IN : Curch, D. C. (Edr). The ruminant animal
  24. digestive physiology and nutrition. Prentice Hall, Englemood Cliff, New York.
  25. Church, D. C., 1991. The Ruminant Animal. Digestive physiology and nutrition. Prentice hall,
  26. Englewood cliffs, New Jersey.
  27. Conway, B.E.J. and E.O'Malley. 1942. Microdiffusion Methods: Ammonia and Urea Using Buffered
  28. Absorbents (Revised Methods for Ranges Greater than 10 µg N). Biochem. J. 36: 655-661.
  29. Damron WS. 2006. Introduction to Animal Science. Ohio (USA): Prentice Hall.
  30. Djaafar Titiek. F, Trimarwati, Retno Utami Hatmi, Ari Widyastuti, Sarjiman, Retno Dw, Gunawan, Erna Winarti, Suparjana, Heri Basuki, Purwaningsih, Erni Apriyati, Sulasmi, Umar Santosa, Yuni MundiarI. 2015. Laporan Akhir Model Pengembangan Pertanian Bioindustri Berbasis
  31. Integrasi Salak Pondoh dan Kambing PE di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Balai Pengkajian
  32. Teknologi Pertanian Yogyakarta.
  33. Fakhoury, W.K. & Priebe, S. 2006. An unholy alliance: subtance abuse and social exclusion among
  34. assertive outtreach patient. Acta Psyhiatrica Scandinavia,114(2), 124-131.
  35. Firsoni, Sulistyo J, Tjakradidjaja AS, dan Suharyono. 2008. Uji Fermentasi In Vitro terhadap Pengaruh
  36. Suplemen Pakan dalam Pakan Komplit. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan
  37. Veteriner. Pusat Aplikasi Teknologi Isotop dan Radiasi BATAN. Jakarta.
  38. General Laboratory Procedures. 1966. Departement of Dairy Science. University of Wisconsin:
  39. Madison
  40. Goering, H.K., and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analyses. (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures,
  41. and Some Applications). In Agriculture Handbook No. 379. United States Department of
  42. Agriculture, Washington, DC (Issue 379).
  43. Haryanto, B. 2012. Perkembangan Penelitian Nutrisi Ruminansia. Balai Penelitian Ternak, Bogor.
  44. Hermon. 1993. Senyawa Nitrogen dalam Ransum Ternak Ruminansia. Artikel Ilmiah. Fakultas
  45. Peternakan. Unversitas Andalas, Padang.
  46. Hermon, H., S. Suryahadi, K.G. Wiryawan, and S. Hardjosoewignjo. 2008. Nisbah Sinkronisasi Suplai
  47. N-Protein dan Energi dalam Rumen Sebagai Basis Formulasi Ransum Ternak Ruminansia.
  48. Media Peternakan. 31(3): 186194.
  49. Humen. I.D. 1982. Digestion and protein metabolism in course manual in nutrition and growth. Ed.
  50. LH LDevelopment Program (AVIDP), New York.
  51. Indrayanto, D. 2013. Degradasi bahan kering, nilai pH dan produksi gas sistem rumen in vitro
  52. terhadap kulit buah kakao. Skripsi Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Hasanudin, Makassar.
  53. Indriani, N., T. R. Sutardi dan Suparwi. 2013. Fermentasi limbah soun dengan menggunakan
  54. Aspergillus niger ditinjau dari kadar volatile fatty acid (VFA) total dan amonia (NH3) secara
  55. in-vitro. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan, 1(3): 804-812.
  56. Jamarun, N. dan Zain, M. 2013. Dasar Nutrisi Ruminansia. Diktat. Edisi I, CV Jaya Surya, Padang.
  57. Karsli M. A, and J. R Russell. 2001. Effects of some dietary factor on ruminal microbial protein
  58. synthesis. Turk J Vet. Anim Sci. 25 : 681- 686.
  59. Kaunang. 2005. Kajian suplementasi probiotik bermineral terhadap produksi VFA, NH3dan
  60. kecernaan zat makanan pada domba. Skripsi. Fakultas Peternakan. Institut Pertanian Bogor,
  61. Bogor.
  62. Lopez, S. 2005. In vitro and In Situ Techniques for Estimating Digestibility. Dalam J. Dijkstra, J. M.
  63. Forbes, and J. France (Eds). Quantitative Aspect of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism. 2nd
  64. Edition. ISBN 0-85199-8143. CABI Publishing, London.
  65. Lowry, O.H., N.J. Rosebrough, A.L. Farr, and R.J. Randall. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin
  66. reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193(1): 265-275.
  67. Mahesti, G. 2009. Pemanfaatan Protein pada Domba Lokal Jantan dengan Bobot Badan dan Aras
  68. Pemberian Pakan yang Berbeda. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
  69. (Tesis).
  70. McDonald PR, Edwads A, Greenhalg JFD & Morgan CA. 2002. Animal Nutrition. 6th Edition. New York
  71. : (US): Logman Scientific and Technical Co. Published in The United States With Jhon Willey
  72. and Sons Inc.
  73. Parakkasi, A. 1999. Ilmu Nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak Ruminansia. Universitas Indonesia Press,
  74. Jakarta.
  75. Pathak, A. K. 2008. Various factors affecting microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. Vet. World,
  76. 1(6), 186-189.
  77. Pell, A., J. R. Chermey and J. S. Jones. 1993. Technilcal note: Forage In-vitro Dry Matter Digestibility
  78. as Influenced by Fibre Source in the Donor Cow Diet. J. Animal Sci 71, Japan.
  79. Perry, T. W., E. Cullinson dan R. S. Lowry. 2003. Feeds and feeding. Pearson Education Inc, New
  80. Jersey USA.
  81. Preston, T. R. and J. A. Leng. 1987. Drought Feeding Strategies Theory and Practice. Feel Valley
  82. Printery, New South Wales. Hal 15.
  83. Rikardo Silaban, Amnah, R., & Simamora, T. (2018). Pemanfaatan limbah pelepah tanaman salak
  84. menggunakan biostarter lokal sebagai sumber pakan alternatif : Program Hibah Pengabdian
  85. Masyarakat Tahun 2018.
  86. Riska. 2020. Pengaruh Pemakaian Tepung Ikan Asin Afkir dalam Ransum Berbasis Jerami Padi
  87. Amoniasi terhadap pH, VFA, NH3, dan Biomassa Mikroba secara In-Vitro. Skripsi. Fakultas
  88. Peternakan Universitas Andalas, Padang.
  89. Riswandi. 2014. Kualitas Silase Eceng Gondok (Eichornia crassipers) dengan Penambahan Dedak
  90. Halus dan Ubi Kayu. Jurnal Peternakan Sriwijaya. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Brawijaya,
  91. Malang, 3(1).
  92. Sakinah D. 2005. Kajian suplementasi probiotik bermineral terhadap produksi VFA, NH3, dan
  93. kecernaan zat makanan pada domba. Fakultas Peternakan, Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian
  94. Bogor.
  95. Santoso B., M.N. Lekito dan Umiyati. 2007. Komposisi kimia dan degradasi nutrien silase rumput
  96. gajah yang diensilase dengan residu daun the hitam. J. Animal Production. 9(3) : 160-165.
  97. Sayuti, N. 1989. Ruminologi. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Andalas, Padang.
  98. Sinclair LA, PC Garnsworthy, JR Newbold, PJ Buttery. 1993. Effect of synchronizing the rate of dietary
  99. energy and nitrogen release on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in
  100. sheep. J. Agr. Sci. Camb. 120: 251-263.
  101. Steel, P. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1991. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika Suatu Pendekatan Geometrik.
  102. Terjemahan B. Sumantri. PT Gramedia. Jakarta.
  103. Stefani, J. W. H., F. Driehuis, J. C. Gottschal, and S. F. Spoelstra. 2010. Silage fermentation processes
  104. and their manipulation: 6-33. Electronic conference on tropical silage. Food Agriculture
  105. Organization.
  106. Stren, M. D and Hoover. 1979. Methods for determination and factor affecting rumen microbial
  107. syntesis. A. Review, J. Animal Sci, 49: 1590-1603.
  108. Sunarso. 1984. Mutu Protein Limbah Argo Industri Ditinjau dari Kinetika Perombakannya oleh
  109. Mikroba Rumen dan Potensinya dalam Menyediakan Protein Bagi Pencernaan Pasca Rumen.
  110. Fakultas Pasca Sarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor. (Tesis Megister Peternakan).
  111. Suharti, S., D. A. Astuti, E. Wina and T. Toharmat. 2018. Rumen microbial population in the in vitro
  112. fermentation of different rations of forage and concentrate in the presence of whole lerak
  113. (Sapindus rarak) fruit extract. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 24(8):1086-1091.
  114. Susanti S., S. Chuzaemi dan soebarinoto. 2001. Pengaruh pemberian konsentrat yang mengandung
  115. bungkil biji kapok terhadap kecernaan ransum. Produk fermentasi dan jumlah protozoa
  116. rumen sapi perah PFH Jantan. Biosain 1 (3): 42-49.
  117. Sutardi, T., 1979. Ketahanan protein bahan makanan terhadap degradasi oleh mikroba rumen dan
  118. manfaatnya bagi peningkatan produktivitas ternak. Prosiding Seminar Penelitian dan
  119. Penunjang Peternakan. LPP Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
  120. Sutardi, T. 1980. Ikhtisar Ruminologi. Bahan Penataran Kursus Peternakan Sapi Perah di Kayu
  121. Ambon, Lembang. BPPLP-Dit, Jend. Peternakan-FAO.
  122. Teti, N., R. Latvia, I. Hernaman, B. Ayuningsih, D. Ramdani, dan Siswoyo. 2018. Pengaruh Imbangan
  123. Protein dan Energi terhadap Kecernaan Nutrien Ransum Domba Garut Betina. Jurnal Ilmu
  124. dan Teknologi Peternakan. 6(2): 97-101.
  125. Tilley, J. M., and R. A.Terry. 1963. A two stage technique, for in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br.
  126. Grassland.gociety 18 (2): 104-111.
  127. Tilley, J. M., and R. A. Terry. 1969. A two stage technique for in- vitro digestion of forage crops. J.
  128. Brit. Grassland Soc.18 (2) : 104-111.
  129. Tilman, A.D., H. Hartadi, S. Reksohadiprojo, S. Lebdosukojo, 1998. Ilmu Makanan Ternak Dasar.
  130. Cetakan ke-4. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
  131. Uddin, M.J., K.Z. Haque, K.M. Jasimuddin, and K.M.M.
  132. Hasan. 2015. Dynamics of microbial protein
  133. synthesis in the rumen - A Review. Ann. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2(5): 116–131.
  134. Widyobroto, B. P, M. Soejono, R. Utomo, Kustantinah, dan A. Agus. 1998. Pengukuran degradasi in
  135. sacco: Review metodologi. Lokakarya Standarisasi Pengukuran Degradasi In Sacco di
  136. Indonesia. Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.