Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 371 Download : 305

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The research aimed to examine the effect of red dragon fruit skin and guava leaves supplemented into beef cattle feed on the concentration of partial VFA and methane gas production. The in vitro study was conducted in a completely randomized design (CRD) with 3 treatments, namely P0: 50 % concentrate + 50 % ammoniated straw (Control), P1: 50 % concentrate + 50 % ammoniated straw + 5 % red dragon fruit skin flour, and P2: 50 % concentrate + 50 % ammonia straw + 5 % red dragon fruit  skin flour + 2.5 % guava leaf flour. The concentrate consisted of 2 parts of rice bran and 1 part of coconut meal. The ratio of concentrat and ammoniated rice straw was 50:50. Each treatment was repeated 6 times. The results showed that the concentration of acetic acid, butyrate and methane gas decreased while the concentration of propionate increased with the addition of red dragon fruit and guava leaves. The research concluded that the addition of 5 % red dragon fruit skin flour combined with 2.5 % guava leaves flour in beef cattle feed could further reduce the concentration of acetic acid, butyric acid and the production of methane gas, but increase the concentration of propionic acid. It is suggested that defaunated agents of red dragon fruit skin and guava leaves could reduce the production of methane gas in the rumen of beef cattle.

Keywords

red dragon fruit skin guava leaves partial VFA concentration methane gas production

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before or is under consideration for publication elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract). When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.

How to Cite
Rahmat, A. N., Suryapratama, W., & Suhartati, F. (2021). Concentration of Partial VFA and Methane Production of Beef Cattle Rument Fluid which Red Dragon Fruit Skin (Hylocereus costaricensis) and Guava Leaf (Psidium guajava L.) in Ammoniated Rice Straw Based Ration. ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 22(3), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2020.22.3.21
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Campbell, N. and J. Reece. 2005. Animal Nutrition. 7th. edn. Pearson Educ. Inc.
  2. Publish.
  3. Cheeke, P. R. 2000. Actual and Potential Applications of Yucca schidigera and Quillaja saponaria Saponins in Human and Animal Nutrition. In Saponins in Food, Feedstuffs and Medicinal Plants. Springer, Dordrecht. Pp. 241-254.
  4. Czerkawski, J.W. 1986. An Introduction to Rumen Studies. 1st Ed. Pergamon Press. New York.
  5. Dioksa, I. M. R., I. M. Mudita, A. A. P. P. Wibawa and I. W. Wirawan. 2015. Metabolit Rumen Sapi Bali yang Diberikan Ransum Terfermentasi dengan Inokulan yang Diproduksi dari Cairan Rumen Sapi Bali dan Rayap. J. Trop. Anim. Sci. 3(2): 386-404.
  6. Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis Agricultural Handbook No. 379. United States Departmen of Agricultural DC. Washington. Pp. 12-15.
  7. González, A. R. C., M. E. B. Barraza, J. D. Viveros and A. C. Martínez. 2014. Rumen Microorganisms and Fermentation. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria. 46(3): 349-361.
  8. Kurniawati, A. 2006. Formulasi Gel Antioksidan Ekstrak Daun Jambu Biji dengan Menggunakan Aquapec HV-505. Jurnal Peternakan. 3(2): 17-25.
  9. Leek, B. F. 1993. Digestion in The Ruminant Stomach. Dukes Physiology of Domestic Animals. 11th ed. M.J. Swenson and W.O. Reece, ed. Cornel University Press, Ithacha. Pp. 387-416.
  10. Martin, G. B., D. Blache and J. Rodger. 2008. Nutritional and Environmental Effects on Reproduction in Small Ruminant. J. Reprod. Fertil. 16 (4): 491-501.
  11. Mitsomori, M. and W. Sun. 2008. Control of Rumen Microbial Fermentation For Mitigrating Methane Emissions From the Rumen. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 21(1): 144-154.
  12. Pribadi, L. W. 2015. Promosi Pertumbuhan Sapi Bali pada Penggemukan Pakan Kurang dengan Addisi Ionophore-Polyether dalam Ransum. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Indonesia. 1(1): 71-77.
  13. Saneto, B. 2008. Karakteristik Kulit Buah Naga Merah (Hylocereus polyrhizus). Agrika. 2(2): 143-149.
  14. Suhartanto. 2014. Effect of Flour and Papaya Leaf Extract Addition to Feed on Gas Production, Digestibility and Energy Values In Vitro. J. Trop. Anim. Prod. 17(2): 32-40.
  15. Susiani, G. R. 2018. Konsentrasi Volatile Fatty Acids Parsial Jumlah Protozoa dan Produksi Gas Metan Cairan Rumen Sapi Potong yang Diberi Pakan Jerami padi Amoniasi dan Disuplementasi Kulit Buah Naga. Thesis. Fakultas Peternakan Unsoed.
  16. Sitoresmi, P. D., L. M. Yusiati and H. Hartadi. 2009. Pengaruh Penambahan Minyak Kelapa, Minyak Biji Bunga Matahari dan Minyak Kelapa Sawit Terhadap Penurunan Produksi Metan di dalam Rumen secara In Vitro. Buletin Peternakan. 33(2): 96-105.
  17. Suwandyastuti, S. N. O. 2007. Produk Metabolisme Rumen pada Domba Jantan. J. Anim. Prod. 9(1): 9-13.
  18. Syamsi, A. N., T. Y. Astuti and P. Soediarto. 2018. Volatile Fatty Acids and Methane Profile of Dairy Cattle Ruminal Fluid was Gived Legumes in Ration Based on Synchronization Protein-Energy Index. Buletin Peternakan. 42(4): 283-289.
  19. Syamsi, A. N., Waldi, L. and Widodo, H. S. 2019. Branched Chain Volatile Fatty Acids Profile of Rumen Fluids Suplemented by Different Meal Protein Sources and Protein-Energy Synchronization Index. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (November.Vol. 372, No. 1, p. 012060). IOP Publishing.
  20. Thalib, A. and Y. Widiyawati. 2008. Peningkatan Produksi dan Kualitas Susu dengan Emisi Gas Metan yang Rendah Melalui Pemberin RMK Sebagai Imbuhan pada Ransum Sapi Perah. JITP. 1(4): 33-42.
  21. Uhi, H. T., A. Parakkasi and B. Haryanto. 2006. Pengaruh Suplemen Katalik Terhadap Karakteristik dan Populasi Mikroba Rumen Domba. Media Peternakan. 29(1): 20-26.
  22. Viera, C., L. M. Yusiati and S. Alim. 2004. Effect of saponin as defaunating agent on in vitro ruminal fermentation of forage and concentrate. Jurnal Pengembangan Peternakan Tropis. 34(3): 231-235.
  23. Wahyono, T., W. T. Sasongko, M. Sholihah and M. Ratnasari. 2017. Pengaruh penambahan tanin daun nangka (Artocarpus heterophyllus) terhadap nilai biologis daun kelor (Moringa oleifera) dan jerami kacang hijau (Vigna radiata) secara in vitro. Buletin Peternakan. 41 (1): 15 -25.
  24. Wahyuni, I. M. D., A. Muktiani and M. Christianto. 2014. Penentuan Dosis Tanin dan Saponin untuk Defaunasi dan Peningkatan Fermentabilitas Pakan. JITP. 3 (3): 133-140.
  25. Widiawati, Y., M. Winugroho and E. Teleni. 2007. Perbandingan Laju Degradasi Rumput Gajah dan Tanaman Leguminosa di dalam Rumen. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner. Bogor.
  26. Widyawati, S.D. 2009. Perbandingan Potensi Daun Ketepeng dan Minyak
  27. Ikan Lemuru Sebagai Agensia Reduksi Metan dalam Memperbaiki Kualitas Pakan Ternak Ruminansia. J. Sains Peternakan. 7 (1): 1 – 7.
  28. Widyawati. 2010. Pengaruh Suplemen Katalik Terhadap Karakteristik dan Populasi Mikroba Rumen Pada Domba. J. Media Peternakan. 29 (1): 20 -26.
  29. Wina, E., S. Muetzel and K. Becker. 2005. The Impact of Saponin-Countaining Plant Materials on Ruminant Production- A review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53(21):8093-8105.