Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 150 Download : 107

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the economic valuation of Sentul chicken to determine the amount of incentive farmers should receive. A survey method has been conducted as the research methodology. The research location was determined purposively, namely in accordance with the research objectives, on the basis of several considerations, the location where the research was located was the Sentul chicken development center where there were active farmer groups. A total of 39 farmers who had a minimum of 100 Sentul chickens/year were censused to become respondents. Data collection was carried out in May - August 2022. The data were analyzed by the contingent valuation method (CVM) using the willingness to accept (WTA) approach in the bidding game. The WTA value sought is the Total WTA (TWTA) and Mean WTA (EWTA) which are converted into incentive values for farmers. Multiple regression analysis has been applied to investigate any significant factors that affected the WTA value. The study results show an estimated total WTA value of IDR 191,220,000 per year and an estimated WTA value of IDR 178,974.36 per chicken per year. Education, experience, land area, income, livestock orientation, and pride are WTA factors that impact farmers, as income (0,024) and pride (0,000) become the most influential factors. Efforts to conserve Sentul chickens can be realized using the incentives indicated by a high WTA value. Therefore, policy makers can conserve Sentul chickens using an incentive approach.

Keywords

contingent valuation economic valuation income, pride willingness to accept

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before or is under consideration for publication elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract). When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.

How to Cite
Firdaus, R. A., Daud, A. R., & Asmara, I. Y. (2023). Economic Valuation of Sentul Chicken in the Framework of Providing Incentives and Sustainability of Animal Genetic Resources (AnGR) in Ciamis District, West Java. ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 25(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2023.25.1.205
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Aini, EN, I Isnaini, S Sukamti, and LN Amalia. 2018. Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan Terhadap Tingkat Kesejahteraan Masyarakat di Kelurahan Kesatrian Kota Malang. Technomedia Journal. 3(1 Agustus):58-72.
  2. Akimi, A, and R Ariadi. 2018. Motivasi Peternak Dalam Budidaya Domba Di Kelompok Tani Sido Maju I Desa Ngablak Kecamatan Ngablak Kabupaten Magelang. Jurnal Pengembangan Penyuluhan Pertanian. 15(28):32-43.
  3. Alkadafi, M. 2014. Penguatan Ekonomi Masyarakat Melalui Pengelolaan Kelembagaan Badan Usaha Milik Desa Menuju Asean Economic Community 2015. Jurnal El-Riyasah. 5(1):32-40.
  4. Ardiyana, M, C Sumantri, S Murtini, and T Sartika. 2018. Keragaman Gen NRAMP-1 dan INOS pada Ayam Sentul Seleksi. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan. 6(2): 48-52.
  5. Arimbawa, PD, and A Widanta. 2017. Pengaruh Luas Lahan, Teknologi, dan Pelatihan Terhadap Pendapatan Petani Padi Dengan Produktivitas Sebagai Variabel intervening Di Kecamatan Mengwi. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Universitas Udayana. 6(8):1601-1627.
  6. Asmara, IY. 2014. Risk status of selected indigenous chicken breeds in Java, Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities for conservation. Disertasi., Graduated School, Charles Darwin University Australia.
  7. Ciamis District Livestock Officer. 2022. Laporan Produksi Komoditi Peternakan Dan Perikanan Tahun 2019-2021. In: DPK Ciamis (ed.). DINAS PETERNAKAN DAN PERIKANAN KABUPATEN CIAMIS, Kabupaten Ciamis Jawa Barat. Obtained on August 2022
  8. Cicia, G, E D'Ercole, and D Marino. 2003. Costs and Benefits of Preserving Farm Animal Genetic Resources From Extinction: CVM And Bio-Economic Model For Valuing A Conservation Program For The Italian Pentro Horse. Ecological Economics. 45(3):445-459.
  9. Dewi, AC, and NAB Rahmani. 2022. Pengaruh Luas Lahan, Kelembagaan Dan Tingkat Pendidikan Terhadap Kesejahteraan Kelompok Petani Ternak Sapi Potong Dengan Modal Sebagai Variabel Moderasi di Desa Paya Bakung, Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Ekonomikawan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan. 22(2):125-138.
  10. Eko, HF, HN Noor, and R Roesdiyanto. 2014. Kinerja Ekonomi Usaha Ayam Sentul Di Kabupaten Ciamis (The Economic Performance Sentul Chicken of Enterpises in Ciamis District). Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan. 1(3):865-873.
  11. Fu, H, Y Peng,L Zheng, Q Liu, L Zhou, Y Zhang, R Kong and CG Turvey. 2022. Heterogenous Choice in WTP and WTA for Renting Land Use Rights in Rural China: Choice Experiments from the Field. Land Use Policy. 119: 1-15.
  12. Huang, X, Cheng, L, Chien, H, Jiang, H, Yang, X, and Yin C. 2019. Sustainability of Returning Wheat Straw to Field to Hebei, Shandong and Jiangsu Provinces: a Contingent Valuation Method. Journal of Cleaner Production. 213: 90-1298
  13. Hutabarat, S, A Sajow, SO Lombogia, and Z Warouw. 2021. Pengaruh Penyuluhan Terhadap Pendapatan Peternak Babi di Desa Kiawa Dua Timur Kecamatan Kawangkoan Utara. ZOOTEC. 41(1):205-213.
  14. Jordan, JL, and AH Elnagheeb. 1993. Willingness to Pay For Improvements in Drinking Water Quality. Water Resources Research. 29(2):237-245.
  15. Kurnianto, E. 2017. Sumber Daya Genetik Ternak Lokal. In: PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL TEKNOLOGI AGRIBISNIS PETERNAKAN (STAP). p 23-33.
  16. Lindhjem, H, Grimsrud, KM, Navrud, S and Kolle SO. 2014. The Social Benefits and Costs of Preserving Forest Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy. 4(2): 202-222.
  17. Makatita, J, and SD Isbandi. 2014. Tingkat Efektivitas Penggunaan Metode Penyuluhan Pengembangan Ternak Sapi Potong di Kabupaten Buru Provinsi Maluku. AGROMEDIA: Berkala Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Pertanian. 32(2)
  18. Mendes, I. 2012. Economic Valuation As A Framework Incentive To Enforce Conservation. Protected Area Management. Intech Open. Ankara, Turkey. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/50063
  19. Nurdayati, N, NI Fidin, and S Supriyanto. 2021. Pengaruh Karakteristik Peternak Terhadap Motivasi Beternak Kambing Perah. Jurnal Pengembangan Penyuluhan Pertanian. 17(32):121-136.
  20. Pearce, DW, and RK Turner. 1989. Economics of Natural Resources and The Environment. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  21. Priyambodo, AW, Harianto, and A Fariyanti. 2016. Analysis Farmer Willingness to Accept and Consumer Willingness to Pay in Batu Malang East Java International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 5(11)doi: 10.21275/ART20162815
  22. Ramanathan, R. 2002. Analytical Methods: Introduction Econometrics with Application and Software. Harcourt College Publishers.
  23. Tumion, B, VV Panelewen, A Makalew, and B Rorimpandey. 2017. Pengaruh Biaya Pakan dan Tenaga Kerja Terhadap Keuntungan Usaha Ayam Ras Petelur Milik Vony Kanaga Di Kelurahan Tawaan Kota Bitung (Study Kasus). ZOOTEC. 37(2):207-215.
  24. Ulfah, M, Perwitasari, D, Jakaria, J, Muladno, M, and Farajallah, A. 2015. Multiple Maternal Origins of Indonesian Crowing Chickens Revealed by Mitochondrial DNA Analysis. Mitochondrial DNA. 1: 1-9.