Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 2 Download : 4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the quality of cattle manure compost with the addition of various peatland vegetation plants. The study used a Completely Randomized Design consisting of five treatments with four replications, namely P1 (Stenochlaena palustris), P2 (Dryopteris sp.), P3 (Hymenachne amplexicaulis), P4 (Eleocharis dulcis), and P5 (Imperata cylindrica). The observed parameters included the physical and chemical properties of compost. Data on physical properties were descriptively analyzed, while chemical properties were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test when significant differences were found among treatments. The results showed that composts P1 and P2 exhibited changes in color, smell, and texture. Compost P3 showed only a color change. Composts P4 and P5 showed changes in color and smell. Final compost temperature ranged from 28.50 to 28.88°C. The addition of peatland vegetation significantly affected pH, organic C, total N, and C/N ratio (P<0.01).

Keywords

quality of compost, physical properties, chemical properties, cattle manure, peatland vegetation

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before or is under consideration for publication elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract). When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.

How to Cite
Anjalani, R., Paulini, & Ningsih, A. K. (2026). The Quality of Cattle Manure Compost with Addition of Various Peatland Vegetation. ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 27(3), 234-240. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2025.27.3.170
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Alfadili, NS., S Noor, BY Hertanto, and M Cahyadi. 2018. The Effect of Various Decomposers on Quality of Cattle Dung Compost. Buletin Peternakan. 42(3): 250-255.
  2. Abu-Zahra TR, RA Ta’any and AR Arabiyyat. 2014. Changes in compost physical and chemical properties during aerobic decomposition. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 3 (10):479–486
  3. Asngad A dan Suparti. 2005. Model Pengembangan pembuatan pupuk organik dengan inokulan (studi kasus sampah di TPA Mojosongo Surakarta). Jurnal Penelitian Sains dan Teknologi. 6(2):101–113
  4. Bachtiar B dan AH Ahmad. 2019. Analisis kandungan hara kompos Johar Cassia siamea dengan penambahan aktivator Promi. BIOMA : Jurnal Biologi Makassar. 4(1):68–76.
  5. Benito M, A Masaguer, A Moliner, N Arrigo and RM Palma. 2003. Chemical and microbiological parameters for the characterisation of the stability and maturity of pruning waste compost Biolology and Fertility of Soils. 37:184–189
  6. Budiman B, S Suyono dan N Fazriaty. 2018. Pengaruh tiga jenis bioaktivator ragi terhadap karakteristik fisik kompos sampah organik di Rumah Sakit Cahaya Kawaluyaan. In Prosiding Pertemuan Ilmiah Nasional Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (PINLITAMAS 1). Cimahi, Oktober 2018. Pp : 298–304. )(in Indonesian with abstract with English).
  7. Dewilda Y and FL Darfyolanda. 2017. Pengaruh komposisi bahan baku kompos (sampah organik pasar, ampas tahu, dan rumen sapi) terhadap kualitas dan kuantitas kompos. Jurnal Dampak. 14(1):52–61.
  8. Faatih M. 2012. Dinamika komunitas Aktinobakteria selama proses pengomposan. Jurnal Kesehatan. 15(3):611–618
  9. Font-Palma C. 2019. Methods for the treatment of cattle manure—A review. C—Journal of Carbon Research. 5(2):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/c5020027
  10. Hasibuan Z H, T Sabrina dan MB Sembiring. 2012. Potensi bakteri Azotobacter dan hijauan mucuna bracteata dalam meningkatkan hara nitrogen kompos tandan kosong kelapa sawit Jurnal Agroekoteknologi. 1(1):237–253.
  11. Jaya A, BS Lautt, EU Antang, S Sibot, S Dohong, P Surawijaya and S Dohong. 2020. Effects of zero burning waste on the quality of liquid fertilizer and vermicompost. International Journal of Agricultural and Biolological Engineering. 13(4):159–165.
  12. Kajiya, Y., Y Ishii, K Fukuyuma and S Idota. 2014. Precise optimization of cattle manure composting using an experimental small-scale instrument. Journal of Biological Sciences. 14(4)317-321. https://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2014.317.321.
  13. Kumalasari R dan E Zulaika. 2016. Pengomposan daun menggunakan konsorsium azotobacter. Jurnal Sains dan Seni ITS. 5(2):64-66.
  14. Marlina E T, DZ Badruzzaman, E Harlia, H Hidayati and I Susilawati. 2020. Microbial population dynamics and fiber reduction in the initial decomposition of beef cattle waste composting. ZIRAA’AH. 45(1):94–102.
  15. Mirwan M. 2015. Optimasi pengomposan sampah kebun dengan variasi aerasi dan penambahan kotoran sapi sebagai bioaktivator. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Lingkungan. 4(1):61–66.
  16. Nada W M. 2015. Stability and maturity of maize stalks compost as affected by aeration rate, C/N ratio and moisture content. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 15(3):751–764. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162015005000051.
  17. Sahwan F L. 2016. Kualitas produk kompos dan karakteristik proses pengomposan sampah kota tanpa pemilahan awal. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan. 11(1):79–85. https://doi.org/10.29122/jtl.v11i1.1225.
  18. Sholihah S M dan MA Wahyuningrum. 2016. Penggunaan bioaktivator kelinci pada pengomposan limbah padat tahu. Jurnal Ilmiah Respati. 2(9):650–658.
  19. Sriharti dan T Salim T. 2010. Pemanfaatan sampah taman (rumput-rumputan) untuk pembuatan kompos. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Kimia “Kejuangan”. Yogyakarta, 26 Januari 2010. Pp:1–8. (in Indonesian with abstract with English).
  20. Triatmojo S, Y Erwanto dan NA Fitriyanto. 2016. Penanganan Limbah Industri Peternakan, Universitas Gadjah Mada Press, Yogyakarta. 206 pages.
  21. Trivana L dan AY Pradhana. 2017. Optimalisasi waktu pengomposan dan kualitas pupuk kandang dari kotoran kambing dan debu sabut kelapa dengan bioaktivator Promi dan Orgadec. Jurnal Sain Veteriner. 35(1):136–144.
  22. Van der Wurff, A.W.G., JG Fuchs, M Raviv and A Termorshuizen. 2016. Handbook for composting and compost use in organic horticulture. BioGreenhouse. http://dx.doi.org/10.18174/375218.
  23. Wahyono, S dan FL Sahwan. 2010. Standarisasi kompos berbahan baku sampah kota. Jurnal Rekayasa Lingkungan. 6(3):223–233.https://doi.org/10.29122/jrl.v6i3.1936.
  24. Widiyaningrum P dan L Lisdiana. 2015. Efektivitas proses pengomposan sampah daun dengan tiga sumber aktivator berbeda rekayasa. Rekayasa.13(2):107–113.
  25. Wulandari D A, R Linda dan M Turnip. 2016. Kualitas kompos dari kombinasi eceng gondok (Eichornia crassipes Mart. Solm) dan pupuk kandang sapi dengan inokulan Trichoderma harzianum L. Protobiont. 5(2):34–44.
  26. Zuhro F, HU Hasanah, S Winarso, M Hoesain dan D Arifandi. 2019. Karakteristik pupuk organik berbahan dasar kotoran hewan. Agritrop. 17(1):103–112.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'WHERE'